Kawasaki M
University of Virginia, Department of Biology, Charlottesville 22903, USA.
Biol Bull. 1996 Aug;191(1):103-8. doi: 10.2307/1543070.
African wave-type electric fish, Gymnarchus, and South American wave-type electric fish, Eigenmannia, have evolved electrosensory and electromotor systems independently. Nevertheless, they exhibit a similar electrical behavior, the jamming avoidance response (JAR). When two individuals with slightly different frequencies of electric organ discharge (EOD) meet, they shift discharge frequencies away from each other to avoid mutual jamming of their electrolocation systems. These two genera of electric fishes perform this behavior using an identical set of complex computational rules. Reflecting their independent evolution, however, neuronal implementation of the computational steps appears to take different forms. One of the essential computational steps, phase comparison, is performed in the hindbrain in Gymnarchus and in the midbrain in Eigenmannia. The comparison of these two species in this paper revealed an example of how different brain structures perform functionally similar tasks in independently evolved systems that have a similar overall behavioral function.
非洲的波型电鱼裸臀鱼和南美洲的波型电鱼线翎电鳗独立进化出了电感应和电运动系统。然而,它们表现出相似的电行为,即干扰回避反应(JAR)。当两个放电频率略有不同的个体相遇时,它们会将放电频率相互远离,以避免其电定位系统相互干扰。这两类电鱼使用相同的一组复杂计算规则来执行这种行为。然而,反映出它们的独立进化,计算步骤的神经元实现似乎采取了不同的形式。其中一个基本的计算步骤,即相位比较,在裸臀鱼的后脑和线翎电鳗的中脑中进行。本文对这两个物种的比较揭示了一个例子,即不同的脑结构如何在具有相似整体行为功能的独立进化系统中执行功能相似的任务。