Menéndez Villanueva R
Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia.
Arch Bronconeumol. 1995 Aug-Sep;31(7):317-22.
This study aimed to quantify the diagnostic value of immunological techniques and methods for rapid analysis of sputum for pneumococcus, using sensitivity and specificity values reported in the literature to calculate positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) according to Bayes formulas. Diagnostic gains of the test are calculated and compared to pretext probability. We located articles reporting sensitivity and specificity of counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIE), coagglutination (CoA) and latex agglutination (LA) tests. We also calculated the probability ratios for the three tests. LA achieved the best overall diagnostic utility rating. CoA had the highest PPV, whereas LA offered the highest NPV. CIE was the least useful. These three tests are more useful at intermediate levels of prevalence of pneumococcus, which coincide with estimate in our population. We conclude that LA and CoA are of greater diagnostic utility for community acquired pneumonia, as they are useful for determining prevalence as well as for deciding initial antibiotic treatment.
本研究旨在量化免疫技术和方法对痰液中肺炎球菌进行快速分析的诊断价值,利用文献报道的敏感度和特异度值,根据贝叶斯公式计算阳性预测值和阴性预测值(PPV和NPV)。计算该检测的诊断增益,并与先验概率进行比较。我们查找了报告对流免疫电泳(CIE)、协同凝集(CoA)和乳胶凝集(LA)试验敏感度和特异度的文章。我们还计算了这三种试验的概率比。LA总体诊断效用评级最佳。CoA的PPV最高,而LA的NPV最高。CIE最无用。这三种试验在肺炎球菌中等流行水平时更有用,这与我们人群中的估计相符。我们得出结论,LA和CoA对社区获得性肺炎具有更大的诊断效用,因为它们有助于确定患病率以及决定初始抗生素治疗。