Edwards E A, Coonrod J D
J Clin Microbiol. 1980 May;11(5):488-91. doi: 10.1128/jcm.11.5.488-491.1980.
Coagglutination was compared with counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIE) for sensitivity and specificity in the detection of pneumococcal antigens in sputum. Initial sputum samples from patients with pneumococcal pneumonia (less than 12 h of antibiotic therapy) were positive for antigens in 37 of 44 cases (84%) by either test. There was a decline in the number of positive results with sputum samples obtained during continuing antibiotic therapy, but the decline was greater with CIE (only 29% of samples were positive at 3 days of therapy) than with coagglutination (61% of samples were positive at 3 days of therapy) (P less than 0.05). Sputum from 3 of 11 patients (27%) and from 2 of 11 patients (18%) with nonpneumococcal pneumonia was positive for pneumococcal antigens by CIE and coagglutination, respectively, indicating a similar degree of non-specificity. Coagglutination produced the same results as CIE with sputum from patients with chronic bronchitis but without pneumonia; 9 of 23 of these patients were positive. Coagglutination was simpler to perform than CIE and required only a fraction (about 1/30) of the antiserum required for CIE. These advantages, plus the greater sensitivity of coagglutination with sputum samples obtained during antibiotic therapy, suggest that coagglutination is preferable to CIE.
比较了协同凝集试验和对流免疫电泳(CIE)检测痰液中肺炎球菌抗原的敏感性和特异性。肺炎球菌肺炎患者(抗生素治疗时间少于12小时)的初始痰液样本,两种检测方法在44例中有37例(84%)抗原呈阳性。在持续抗生素治疗期间获取的痰液样本阳性结果数量有所下降,但CIE下降幅度更大(治疗3天时仅29%的样本呈阳性),而协同凝集试验下降幅度较小(治疗3天时61%的样本呈阳性)(P<0.05)。11例非肺炎球菌肺炎患者中,分别有3例(27%)和2例(18%)的痰液通过CIE和协同凝集试验检测肺炎球菌抗原呈阳性,表明两者非特异性程度相似。协同凝集试验对慢性支气管炎但无肺炎患者痰液检测结果与CIE相同;23例此类患者中有9例呈阳性。协同凝集试验比CIE操作更简便,所需抗血清仅为CIE的约1/30。这些优势,加上协同凝集试验对抗生素治疗期间获取的痰液样本敏感性更高,表明协同凝集试验优于CIE。