Guzzetta P, Toews G B, Robertson K J, Pierce A K
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983 Sep;128(3):461-4. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1983.128.3.461.
Rapid identification of pathogens in patients with bacterial pneumonia is important for optimal antimicrobial therapy. Coagglutination was compared with counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIE) for sensitivity and specificity in the detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Hemophilus influenzae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa antigens in sputum specimens of 101 patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Coagglutination detected the appropriate bacterial antigen in 16 of 17 (94%) definite etiology patients and CIE detected 11 (64%). In 17 probable etiology patients, bacterial antigens were detected by coagglutination in 15 (88%) and by CIE in 7 (41%). Only 1 pathogen was falsely identified in the 19 culture-negative control patients, indicating a high degree of specificity for both tests. Coagglutination was more sensitive than CIE (p less than 0.05) or sputum stained with Gram's stain (p less than 0.05) in correctly identifying the putative pathogen in sputum. Our results strongly suggest that coagglutination is a useful diagnostic technique for establishing a rapid etiologic diagnosis in community-acquired pneumonia.
快速鉴定细菌性肺炎患者的病原体对于优化抗菌治疗至关重要。对101例社区获得性肺炎患者痰液标本中肺炎链球菌、流感嗜血杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和铜绿假单胞菌抗原的检测,比较了协同凝集试验与对流免疫电泳(CIE)的敏感性和特异性。在17例明确病因的患者中,协同凝集试验在16例(94%)中检测到相应细菌抗原,而CIE检测到11例(64%)。在17例可能病因的患者中,协同凝集试验在15例(88%)中检测到细菌抗原,CIE在7例(41%)中检测到。在19例培养阴性的对照患者中仅1种病原体被错误鉴定,表明两种检测方法的特异性都很高。在正确鉴定痰液中假定病原体方面,协同凝集试验比CIE(p<0.05)或革兰氏染色痰液(p<0.05)更敏感。我们的结果强烈表明,协同凝集试验是在社区获得性肺炎中进行快速病因诊断的一种有用的诊断技术。