Manert W, Haller M, Briegel J, Hummel T, Kilger E, Polasek J, Forst H, Peter K
Institut für Anaesthesiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.
Anaesthesist. 1996 May;45(5):437-48. doi: 10.1007/s001010050278.
Mortality of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in Germany is about 60%. Respiratory therapy can make the lung injury worse by high positive airway pressures, high tidal volumes and high inspiratory oxygen concentrations. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was employed to reduce aggressive mechanical ventilation, but it has not been proved to be superior to conventional ventilation. However, encouraged by recently developed improvements in the technique and concept of ECMO, we introduced this therapy into our program for the treatment of ARDS. PATIENTS AND METHODS. All patients with severe ARDS (lung injury score > 2.5) admitted to our multidisciplinary intensive care unit from March 1992 to March 1995 were evaluated prospectively. After admission, the patients first underwent a conventional therapeutic approach, including pressure-controlled inverse-ratio ventilation, permissive hypercapnia, changes in body position (in particular, the prone position), negative fluid balance, anti-biotics, and low-dose hydrocortisone infusion. ECMO via a covalently heparin-coated, venovenous bypass-system with a vortex pump and two membrane lungs was performed if ARDS did not improve after 24-96 h of conventional therapy and if two of three of the slow-entry criteria for ECMO were fulfilled: (1) PaO2/FiO2 < 150 mmHg at PEEP > 5 mbar; (2) semistatic compliance < 30 ml/mbar; (3) right-left shunt > 30%. Only in cases of life-threatening hypoxemia (PaO2 < 50 mmHg at FiO2 1.0 and PEEP > 5 mbar for > 2 h (fast-entry criteria) was ECMO instituted immediately. RESULTS. Sixty patients fulfilled the entry criteria for our study. Thirty-nine patients were treated with a conventional protocol, 37 after improvement of ARDS and 2 who had not improved but in whom there were contraindications to the use of ECMO. ECMO was performed in 10 patients who had not improved, but who fulfilled the slow-entry criteria and in 11 primarily hypoxemic patients who fulfilled the fast-entry criteria. The survival rate was 30/39 (77%) for the conventional therapy group, 6/10 (60%) for the slow-entry group, and 11/11 (100%) for the fast-entry group. The onset of ECMO allowed a significant decrease in peak and mean airway pressures, tidal volume, ventilatory rate, minute volume and inspiratory oxygen concentration. Sufficient gas exchange was provided, and pulmonary artery pressures significantly decreased on bypass. The most frequent complications on bypass were pneumothorax (15/21 patients) and bleeding (7/21 patients). CONCLUSION. In comparison with the historical results at our own institution, the present study demonstrates an improvement in the survival rate from 56% to 78% since ECMO has become available. We conclude that venovenous ECMO with a heparin-bonded bypass circuit is an effective additional option for the treatment of patients with severe ARDS.
德国严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的死亡率约为60%。呼吸治疗可能会因高气道正压、高潮气量和高吸入氧浓度而使肺损伤加重。体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)被用于减少激进的机械通气,但尚未被证明优于传统通气。然而,受近期ECMO技术和理念改进的鼓舞,我们将这种治疗方法引入了我们的ARDS治疗方案。患者与方法。对1992年3月至1995年3月入住我们多学科重症监护病房的所有重度ARDS患者(肺损伤评分>2.5)进行前瞻性评估。入院后,患者首先接受传统治疗方法,包括压力控制反比通气、允许性高碳酸血症、体位改变(特别是俯卧位)、负液体平衡、抗生素和低剂量氢化可的松输注。如果ARDS在传统治疗24 - 96小时后未改善,且满足ECMO的三个缓慢启动标准中的两个,则通过带有涡流泵和两个膜肺的共价肝素涂层静脉 - 静脉旁路系统进行ECMO:(1)在呼气末正压(PEEP)>5 mbar时,动脉血氧分压(PaO2)/吸入氧分数(FiO2)<150 mmHg;(2)静态顺应性<30 ml/mbar;(3)右向左分流>30%。仅在危及生命的低氧血症情况下(在FiO2 1.0和PEEP>5 mbar时,PaO2<50 mmHg持续>2小时(快速启动标准))立即启动ECMO。结果。60名患者符合我们研究的入选标准。39名患者接受传统方案治疗,其中37名ARDS改善后,2名未改善但存在使用ECMO的禁忌证。10名未改善但满足缓慢启动标准的患者和11名满足快速启动标准的主要低氧血症患者接受了ECMO治疗。传统治疗组的生存率为30/39(77%),缓慢启动组为6/10(60%),快速启动组为11/11(100%)。启动ECMO后,气道峰压、平均气道压、潮气量、通气频率、分钟通气量和吸入氧浓度显著降低。提供了充足的气体交换,旁路时肺动脉压显著降低。旁路最常见的并发症是气胸(15/21例患者)和出血(7/21例患者)。结论。与我们自己机构的历史结果相比,本研究表明自ECMO可用以来,生存率从56%提高到了78%。我们得出结论,带有肝素结合旁路回路的静脉 - 静脉ECMO是治疗重度ARDS患者的一种有效的额外选择。