• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

出了什么问题:关于一名青少年拒绝输血决定的多种观点

What went wrong: multiple perspectives on an adolescent's decision to refuse blood transfusions.

作者信息

Lawry K, Slomka J, Goldfarb J

机构信息

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Pediatrics, OH 44195, USA.

出版信息

Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1996 Jun;35(6):317-21. doi: 10.1177/000992289603500605.

DOI:10.1177/000992289603500605
PMID:8782956
Abstract

Persons with religious beliefs that conflict with mainstream medical practice create a tension for clinicians between honoring the different religious perspectives of the individual or carrying out what they believe to be their professional obligation. This is a patient presentation of an adolescent Jehovah's Witness who refuses blood transfusions. The major issue in this patient is the conflict among three values (1) respect for religious beliefs, (2) respect for a competent person's right to refuse treatment, and (3) the ability of an adolescent to make good decisions for himself. Other dilemmas presented by this patient are the lack of a coordinated plan of care, the lack of communication with the patient and family, and the lack of attention to social factors that influence the patient's situation and his resulting care.

摘要

宗教信仰与主流医疗实践相冲突的患者,给临床医生带来了一种两难境地:是尊重个人不同的宗教观点,还是履行他们认为的职业义务。这是一位拒绝输血的青少年耶和华见证人的病例报告。该患者面临的主要问题是三种价值观之间的冲突:(1)尊重宗教信仰;(2)尊重有行为能力的人拒绝治疗的权利;(3)青少年为自己做出明智决定的能力。该患者还存在其他困境,包括缺乏协调的护理计划、与患者及其家人缺乏沟通,以及忽视影响患者状况及其后续护理的社会因素。

相似文献

1
What went wrong: multiple perspectives on an adolescent's decision to refuse blood transfusions.出了什么问题:关于一名青少年拒绝输血决定的多种观点
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1996 Jun;35(6):317-21. doi: 10.1177/000992289603500605.
2
Jehovah's Witnesses' refusal of blood: obedience to scripture and religious conscience.耶和华见证会对输血的拒绝:对经文和宗教良知的遵从。
J Med Ethics. 1999 Dec;25(6):469-72. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.6.469.
3
Bioethics of the refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: Part 2. A novel approach based on rational non-interventional paternalism.耶和华见证人的拒血行为的生物伦理学:第二部分。基于理性非干预家长主义的新方法。
J Med Ethics. 1998 Oct;24(5):295-301. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.5.295.
4
Refusal of treatment by an adolescent: the deliverances of different consciences.青少年拒绝治疗:不同良知的裁决
HEC Forum. 1998 Mar;10(1):9-23. doi: 10.1023/a:1008802516670.
5
Blood transfusions and Jehovah's Witnesses. The impact of the patient's unusual beliefs in critical care.输血与耶和华见证会信徒。患者的特殊信仰对重症监护的影响。
Crit Care Clin. 1986 Jan;2(1):91-100.
6
Bioethics of the refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: Part 3. A proposal for a don't-ask-don't-tell policy.耶和华见证人的拒输血生物伦理学:第三部分。关于“不问不说”政策的提议。
J Med Ethics. 1999 Dec;25(6):463-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.6.463.
7
When religion collides with medicine.当宗教与医学发生冲突时。
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Feb;156(2):304-7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.2.304.
8
Recent developments in medical care of Jehovah's Witnesses.耶和华见证人的医疗护理近期进展。
West J Med. 1999 May;170(5):297-301.
9
Transfusion-free treatment of Jehovah's Witnesses: respecting the autonomous patient's rights.对耶和华见证人的无输血治疗:尊重自主患者的权利。
J Med Ethics. 1998 Oct;24(5):302-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.5.302.
10
Children of Jehovah's Witnesses and adolescent Jehovah's Witnesses: what are their rights?耶和华见证人的儿童和青少年耶和华见证人:他们有哪些权利?
Arch Dis Child. 2005 Jul;90(7):715-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.067843.

引用本文的文献

1
Is the capacity to consent different from the capacity to refuse treatments and procedures in adolescence?在青少年时期,同意的能力与拒绝治疗和程序的能力不同吗?
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2025 Jul-Aug;101(4):501-510. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2025.04.004. Epub 2025 May 15.
2
Bioethics of the refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: Part 2. A novel approach based on rational non-interventional paternalism.耶和华见证人的拒血行为的生物伦理学:第二部分。基于理性非干预家长主义的新方法。
J Med Ethics. 1998 Oct;24(5):295-301. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.5.295.