Gray C M, Maldonado P E, Wilson M, McNaughton B
Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis 95616, USA.
J Neurosci Methods. 1995 Dec;63(1-2):43-54. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(95)00085-2.
The majority of techniques for separating multiple single-unit spike trains from a multi-unit recording rely on the assumption that different cells exhibit action potentials having unique amplitudes and waveforms. When this assumption fails, due to the similarity of spike shape among different cells or to the presence of complex spikes with declining intra-burst amplitude, these methods lead to errors in classification. In an effort to avoid these errors, the stereotrode (McNaughton et al., 1983) and later the tetrode (O'Keefe and Reece, 1993; Wilson and McNaughton, 1993) recording techniques were developed. Because the latter technique has been applied primarily to the hippocampus, we sought to evaluate its performance in the neocortex. Multi-unit recordings, using single tetrodes, were made at 28 sites in area 17 of 3 anesthetized cats. Neurons were activated with moving bars and square wave gratings. Single units were separated by identification of clusters in 2-D projections of either peak-to-peak amplitude, spike width, spike area, or the 1st versus 2nd principal components of the waveforms recorded on each channel. Using tetrodes, we recorded a total of 154 single cells (mean = 5.4, max = 9). By cross-checking the performance of the tetrode with the stereotrode and electrode, we found that the best of the 6 possible stereotrode pairs and the best of 4 possible electrodes from each tetrode yielded 102 (mean = 3.6, max = 7) and 95 (mean = 3.4, max = 6) cells, respectively. Moreover, we found that the number of cells isolated at each site by the tetrode was greater than the stereotrode or electrode in 16/28 and 28/28 cases, respectively. Thus, both stereotrodes, and particularly electrodes, often lumped 2 or more cells in a single cluster that could be easily separated by the tetrode. We conclude that tetrode recording currently provides the best and most reliable method for the isolation of multiple single units in the neocortex using a single probe.
大多数从多单元记录中分离多个单单元放电序列的技术都依赖于这样一种假设,即不同的细胞表现出具有独特幅度和波形的动作电位。当这个假设不成立时,由于不同细胞之间尖峰形状的相似性,或者由于存在爆发内幅度下降的复杂尖峰,这些方法会导致分类错误。为了避免这些错误,人们开发了立体电极(麦克诺顿等人,1983年),后来又开发了四极管(奥基夫和里斯,1993年;威尔逊和麦克诺顿,1993年)记录技术。由于后一种技术主要应用于海马体,我们试图评估其在新皮层中的性能。在3只麻醉猫的17区的28个位点进行了使用单个四极管的多单元记录。用移动的条形和方波光栅激活神经元。通过识别每个通道记录的波形的峰峰值幅度、尖峰宽度、尖峰面积或第一与第二主成分的二维投影中的聚类来分离单个单元。使用四极管,我们总共记录了154个单细胞(平均值 = 5.4,最大值 = 9)。通过将四极管与立体电极和电极的性能进行交叉核对,我们发现6个可能的立体电极对中最好的一对以及每个四极管中4个可能的电极中最好的一个分别产生了102个(平均值 = 3.6,最大值 = 7)和95个(平均值 = 3.4,最大值 = 6)细胞。此外,我们发现,在16/28和28/28的情况下,四极管在每个位点分离出的细胞数量分别大于立体电极或电极。因此,立体电极,尤其是电极,常常将2个或更多细胞归为一个可以很容易被四极管分离的聚类。我们得出结论,目前四极管记录为使用单个探针在新皮层中分离多个单单元提供了最好和最可靠的方法。