Suppr超能文献

囊性纤维化中高与低脂肪酶耐酸酶制剂的比较:一项交叉随机临床试验。

High- versus low-lipase acid-resistant enzyme preparations in cystic fibrosis: a crossover randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Lancellotti L, Cabrini G, Zanolla L, Mastella G

机构信息

Regional Cystic Fibrosis Center, Ospedale Maggiore, Verona, Italy.

出版信息

J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1996 Jan;22(1):73-8. doi: 10.1097/00005176-199601000-00012.

Abstract

High-strength pancreatic enzyme preparations have recently come into widespread use in some countries for treatment of pancreatic insufficiency in cystic fibrosis. However, the therapeutic equivalence of these preparations to the standard acid-resistant microsphere preparations, under the same lipase dosage, has not been demonstrated by appropriate clinical trials; they are also considered responsible for severe colonic stricture. In a randomized crossover study, 20 adolescent or adult cystic fibrosis patients were treated in hospital with both low-lipase (A) and high-lipase (B) enteric-coated microsphere preparations. The fat excretion coefficient, evaluated over two 72-h fat balance periods (measured fat intake, 1.43 to 3 g/kg/day according to age), was the main response variable, secondary variables being stool wet and dry weight, fecal nitrogen output, and energy loss. With both preparations, patients were given a daily dose of 1,500-2,000 lipase BP U/g fat ingested, distributed across four meals. The low-strength preparation was divided into three doses during each meal, while the high-strength preparation was taken as a single dose in the middle of each meal. The considerable variability of results did not provide conclusive evidence of equivalence or significant differences between the two preparations in terms of steatorrhea and other variables. However, mean differences between the two treatments and their 95% confidence intervals showed less satisfactory results with the high-lipase preparation. A high-strength preparation is thought to release relatively less enzyme activity in the small intestine, forcing patients to increase their dosage and possibly creating a dangerous enzyme hyperconcentration in the large intestine. For this reason, the occasional occurrence of colonic stricture should be borne in mind, as must the possible scope for division of dosage during each meal.

摘要

近年来,高强度胰酶制剂在一些国家已广泛用于治疗囊性纤维化患者的胰腺功能不全。然而,在相同脂肪酶剂量下,这些制剂与标准耐酸微球制剂的治疗等效性尚未经适当临床试验证实;它们还被认为是导致严重结肠狭窄的原因。在一项随机交叉研究中,20例青少年或成年囊性纤维化患者在医院接受低脂酶(A)和高脂酶(B)肠溶微球制剂治疗。在两个72小时脂肪平衡期(根据年龄,测量的脂肪摄入量为1.43至3克/千克/天)内评估的脂肪排泄系数是主要反应变量,次要变量为粪便干湿重量、粪便氮输出量和能量损失。两种制剂均给予患者每日剂量为每摄入1克脂肪1500 - 2000脂肪酶英国药典单位,分四餐服用。低强度制剂每餐分三剂服用,而高强度制剂在每餐中间作为一剂服用。结果的显著变异性并未提供确凿证据证明两种制剂在脂肪泻及其他变量方面具有等效性或显著差异。然而,两种治疗之间的平均差异及其95%置信区间显示,高脂酶制剂的结果不太理想。高强度制剂被认为在小肠中释放的酶活性相对较少,迫使患者增加剂量,并可能在大肠中造成危险的酶高浓度。因此,应牢记偶尔发生结肠狭窄的情况,以及每餐剂量分配的可能范围。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验