Santoni J R, Santoni-Williams C
Universidad Autonoma de Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Neurophysiol Clin. 1996;26(3):164-9. doi: 10.1016/0987-7053(96)89627-4.
Nociceptive stimuli were tested in 373 sleep EEG from 349 children with febrile convulsions and 50 control children (mean age: 2.54 and 2.05 years, respectively). Stimuli consisted of light pecks on each limb with a beveled cut plastic straw or a toothpick. Responses were deemed abnormal if frontal theta episodes would repeat three times without awakening. These abnormal responses appeared in 232 (62%) out of the 373 children of the febrile convulsive group, and in only 4 (8%) out of the 50 children in the normal control group: confidence interval significant at 95%. During sleep recording without stimulation, this sign is directly related to spontaneous theta bursts and inversely related to focal activity, but bears no relationship with sleep induction agents, generalized spike and waves, or delta discharges. In 24 repeat recordings, it begins to disappear at 3.7 years of age. Such responses to nociceptive stimuli should be considered characteristic of febrile convulsions.
对349名热性惊厥儿童和50名对照儿童(平均年龄分别为2.54岁和2.05岁)的373份睡眠脑电图进行了伤害性刺激测试。刺激包括用带斜面切口的塑料吸管或牙签轻戳每个肢体。如果额叶θ波发作在未唤醒的情况下重复三次,则反应被视为异常。在热性惊厥组的373名儿童中,有232名(62%)出现了这些异常反应,而在正常对照组的50名儿童中,只有4名(8%)出现:95%置信区间有显著差异。在无刺激的睡眠记录期间,该体征与自发θ波爆发直接相关,与局灶性活动呈负相关,但与睡眠诱导剂、全身性棘波和慢波或δ波放电无关。在24次重复记录中,该体征在3.7岁时开始消失。这种对伤害性刺激的反应应被视为热性惊厥的特征。