Marks G B, Yates D H, Sist M, Ceyhan B, De Campos M, Scott D M, Barnes P J
Asthma Laboratory, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK.
Thorax. 1996 Aug;51(8):793-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.51.8.793.
There is some evidence that the perception of bronchoconstriction may very according to the nature of the provoking stimulus. The aims of this study were, firstly, to develop a method for measuring dyspnoea during induced bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma and, secondly, to apply this method to testing differences between directly and indirectly acting bronchoconstricting stimuli.
Descriptive terms suitable for quantifying respiratory discomfort due to bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma were identified in a preliminary investigation. The relation between reduction in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and respiratory discomfort, measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS), was then studied during challenges with three different inhaled stimuli: methacholine (MCH), sodium metabisulphite (MBS), and adenosine monophosphate (AMP). Three indices were calculated to describe the relation: the VAS value associated with a 20% fall in FEV1 (FEV20 VAS); the ratio of the final VAS value to the final percentage fall in FEV1 (VAS-FEV1 ratio); and the regression coefficient for predicting VAS from the percentage fall in FEV1 within each challenge (beta VAS FEV1).
"Difficulty in breathing" and "chest tightness" were selected as suitable terms for quantifying respiratory discomfort. There were no differences between the three agonists in the qualitative aspects of the respiratory sensation. In paired challenges with the same agonist the three indices were all found to be reproducible for both sensations measured. MCH induced less intense difficulty in breathing and chest tightness for a given fall in FEV1 than did AMP. There was a trend in the same direction for the comparison between MCH and MBS. There were no differences between AMP and MBS. FEV20 VAS was less powerful in discriminating between agonists than the two slope indices.
The relation between induced reduction in FEV1 and the intensity of respiratory discomfort can be measured reliably. The indirectly acting bronchoconstricting agonists AMP and MBS induced more intense respiratory discomfort for a given fall in FEV1 than the direct agonist MCH. This may be due to differences in unmeasured mechanical changes in the lungs or to an additional action on airway sensory nerves.
有证据表明,对支气管收缩的感知可能因激发刺激的性质而异。本研究的目的,首先是开发一种测量哮喘患者诱发支气管收缩时呼吸困难的方法,其次是应用该方法测试直接和间接作用的支气管收缩刺激之间的差异。
在初步调查中确定了适合量化哮喘患者因支气管收缩引起的呼吸不适的描述性术语。然后在使用三种不同吸入刺激物(乙酰甲胆碱(MCH)、焦亚硫酸钠(MBS)和单磷酸腺苷(AMP))进行激发试验期间,研究一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)降低与使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量的呼吸不适之间的关系。计算了三个指数来描述这种关系:与FEV1下降20%相关的VAS值(FEV20 VAS);最终VAS值与FEV1最终下降百分比的比值(VAS-FEV1比值);以及在每次激发试验中根据FEV1下降百分比预测VAS的回归系数(βVAS FEV1)。
“呼吸困难”和“胸闷”被选为量化呼吸不适的合适术语。三种激动剂在呼吸感觉的定性方面没有差异。在使用相同激动剂的配对激发试验中,发现对于所测量的两种感觉,这三个指数都是可重复的。对于给定的FEV1下降,MCH引起的呼吸困难和胸闷程度低于AMP。MCH与MBS之间的比较也有相同方向的趋势。AMP和MBS之间没有差异。FEV20 VAS在区分激动剂方面不如两个斜率指数有效。
可以可靠地测量诱发的FEV1降低与呼吸不适强度之间的关系。对于给定的FEV1下降,间接作用的支气管收缩激动剂AMP和MBS比直接激动剂MCH引起更强烈的呼吸不适。这可能是由于肺部未测量的机械变化差异或对气道感觉神经的额外作用。