• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复发性颈动脉疾病:再次手术的最佳技术。

Recurrent carotid disease: optimum technique for redo surgery.

作者信息

Raithel D

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Nuremberg Hospital, Germany.

出版信息

J Endovasc Surg. 1996 Feb;3(1):69-75. doi: 10.1583/1074-6218(1996)003<0069:RCDOTF>2.0.CO;2.

DOI:10.1583/1074-6218(1996)003<0069:RCDOTF>2.0.CO;2
PMID:8798128
Abstract

Carotid restenosis has been a well-recognized, though not well-understood, long-term complication of carotid endarterectomy. Various factors contribute to recurrent stenosis, but the chief cause is technical faults during the primary procedure. Redo endarterectomy or graft reconstruction are the traditional and most effective procedures for treating symptomatic or high-grade (> 80%) asymptomatic restenotic lesions. To reduce the potential for carotid restenosis, eversion endarterectomy is recommended as the technique of choice for de novo carotid disease treatment. Angioscopy is useful in detecting correctable technical errors that could predispose to restenosis.

摘要

颈动脉再狭窄一直是颈动脉内膜切除术一种公认的、但尚未被充分理解的长期并发症。多种因素导致复发性狭窄,但主要原因是初次手术期间的技术失误。再次内膜切除术或移植重建术是治疗有症状或高度(> 80%)无症状再狭窄病变的传统且最有效的手术方法。为降低颈动脉再狭窄的可能性,推荐采用外翻内膜切除术作为治疗初发性颈动脉疾病的首选技术。血管镜检查有助于检测可能导致再狭窄的可纠正技术错误。

相似文献

1
Recurrent carotid disease: optimum technique for redo surgery.复发性颈动脉疾病:再次手术的最佳技术。
J Endovasc Surg. 1996 Feb;3(1):69-75. doi: 10.1583/1074-6218(1996)003<0069:RCDOTF>2.0.CO;2.
2
Long-term restenosis rate of eversion endarterectomy on the internal carotid artery.颈内动脉外翻内膜切除术的长期再狭窄率。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004 May;27(5):537-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.02.017.
3
Eversion carotid endarterectomy: a technical alternative that may obviate patch closure in women.外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术:一种可能避免女性患者使用补片修补的技术替代方案。
Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Oct;11(5):347-52. doi: 10.1016/S0967-2109(03)00076-0.
4
[Carotid endarterectomy by eversion and reimplantation. Techniques and results].[外翻及再植入式颈动脉内膜切除术。技术与结果]
J Mal Vasc. 1997 Jul;22(3):168-72.
5
Operative intervention for carotid restenosis is safe and effective.对颈动脉再狭窄进行手术干预是安全有效的。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Nov;34(5):561-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.06.003. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
6
Surgery for carotid stenosis: the quest for the ideal technique.颈动脉狭窄的手术治疗:对理想技术的探索。
Eur J Vasc Surg. 1993 Jul;7(4):361-3. doi: 10.1016/s0950-821x(05)80250-6.
7
[Eversion carotid endarterectomy: evaluation of results after changing the operation technique].
Cas Lek Cesk. 2011;150(1):41-3.
8
Redo carotid surgery: An analysis of materials and configurations used in carotid reoperations and their influence on perioperative stroke and subsequent recurrent stenosis.
J Vasc Surg. 1999 Jan;29(1):72-80; discussion 80-1. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70350-2.
9
[Eversion endarterectomy of the internal carotid artery].[颈内动脉外翻内膜切除术]
Vasa Suppl. 1992;37:83-4.
10
Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后再狭窄
Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Dec;60(12):1625-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2005.00775.x. Epub 2006 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Carotid angioplasty and stenting. Will they match the gold standard?颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术。它们能与金标准相媲美吗?
Tex Heart Inst J. 1998;25(1):1-9.