• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大公司道路安全改善。不同措施的实验性比较。

Road safety improvement in large companies. An experimental comparison of different measures.

作者信息

Gregersen N P, Brehmer B, Morén B

机构信息

Swedish Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI), Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 1996 May;28(3):297-306. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(95)00060-7.

DOI:10.1016/0001-4575(95)00060-7
PMID:8799433
Abstract

Road accidents among professional drivers are a major problem in many companies. There are several traditional measures for improving safety, but knowledge about what measures are most effective is rather limited. The aim of the study is to compare four different measures for reducing accident involvement through changed driver behaviour. The measures are driver training, group discussions, campaigns and bonuses for accident free driving. Five groups of approximately 900 drivers each employed by the Swedish telephone company "Televerket" have been used in the experiment. Four of the groups were test groups, where each took part in one of the measures. The fifth group was a control group. The effect on accident risk (accidents in relation to mileage) and accident costs have been calculated for a period of 2 years after the measures were applied. The results show that group discussions and driver training with the rather unusual design used in the experiment succeeded in improving the accident risk compared to the control group. Accident costs were reduced in all four test groups, but not in the control group.

摘要

职业司机的道路交通事故是许多公司面临的一个主要问题。有几种传统的安全改进措施,但对于哪些措施最有效,相关知识相当有限。本研究的目的是比较四种不同的措施,通过改变司机行为来减少事故发生率。这些措施包括司机培训、小组讨论、宣传活动以及无事故驾驶奖金。瑞典电话公司 “Televerket” 雇佣的五组司机,每组约900人,参与了该实验。其中四组为测试组,每组参与一种措施。第五组为对照组。在采取措施后的两年时间里,计算了对事故风险(事故与里程数的关系)和事故成本的影响。结果表明,与对照组相比,实验中采用的设计颇为独特的小组讨论和司机培训成功降低了事故风险。所有四个测试组的事故成本都有所降低,但对照组没有。

相似文献

1
Road safety improvement in large companies. An experimental comparison of different measures.大公司道路安全改善。不同措施的实验性比较。
Accid Anal Prev. 1996 May;28(3):297-306. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(95)00060-7.
2
Road traffic accidents and self-reported Portuguese car driver's attitudes, behaviors, and opinions: Are they related?道路交通事故与葡萄牙汽车驾驶员自我报告的态度、行为和观点:它们之间有关联吗?
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Oct 2;17(7):705-11. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1150591. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
3
Accident involvement among learner drivers--an analysis of the consequences of supervised practice.新手驾驶员的事故参与情况——对有监督练习后果的分析
Accid Anal Prev. 2003 Sep;35(5):725-30. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00051-9.
4
Reviewing car fleet performance after advanced driver training.在高级驾驶员培训后评估车队表现。
Occup Med (Lond). 1999 Nov;49(8):559-61. doi: 10.1093/occmed/49.8.559.
5
Attitudes and road accident risk.态度与道路交通事故风险。
Accid Anal Prev. 1997 Mar;29(2):153-9. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(96)00071-1.
6
Optimal use of warning signs in traffic.交通中警示标志的优化使用。
Accid Anal Prev. 1999 Nov;31(6):729-38. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00036-6.
7
Evaluation of a re-training program for older drivers.老年驾驶员再培训项目评估
Can J Public Health. 2004 Jul-Aug;95(4):295-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03405135.
8
Analyzing fault and severity in pedestrian-motor vehicle accidents in China.分析中国行人-机动车事故中的故障和严重程度。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Dec;73:141-50. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.08.018. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
9
The effect on accident risk of a change in driver education in Denmark.丹麦驾驶员教育变化对事故风险的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2002 Jan;34(1):111-21. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(01)00005-7.
10
Cost benefit study of a safety campaign's impact on road safety.安全运动对道路安全影响的成本效益研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Aug;117:205-215. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety interventions for the prevention of accidents at work: A systematic review.预防工作场所事故的安全干预措施:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 1;18(2):e1234. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1234. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Vital signs: seat belt use among long-haul truck drivers--United States, 2010.生命体征:2010年美国长途卡车司机使用安全带情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Mar 6;64(8):217-21.
3
Work-related road accidents in France.法国与工作相关的道路交通事故。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17(8):773-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1015667114529.