Morgan L, Marenah C B, Jeffcoate W J, Morgan A G
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Nottingham City Hospital, UK.
Diabet Med. 1996 Jun;13(6):514-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199606)13:6<514::AID-DIA108>3.0.CO;2-4.
This study investigates the reliability of glycated haemoglobin, measured by electroendosmosis or by affinity chromatography, fructosamine, and albumin adjusted fructosamine, as indices of glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetes complicated by chronic renal failure. Twenty uraemic diabetic patients took part in the study, including 5 patients managed conservatively, 6 on CAPD, 3 on haemodialysis, and 6 renal transplant recipients. Results were compared with those from 15 diabetic subjects with normal renal function. In renal patients, there was significant correlation between glycated haemoglobin measured by electroendosmosis (r = 0.45; p = 0.04) or by affinity chromatography (r = 0.57; p = 0.01) and mean capillary blood glucose concentrations over the previous 6 weeks. The regression equations did not differ significantly between subjects with renal failure and those with normal renal function, suggesting that similar ranges can be used in interpreting glycated haemoglobin results from each group of patients. Patients on haemodialysis may be an exception; there was evidence that glycated haemoglobin may be misleadingly low in such subjects. Fructosamine correlated significantly with mean blood glucose concentrations measured over the previous week in patients with normal renal function (r = 0.75; p = 0.001), but not in patients with chronic renal failure (r = -0.1; p = 0.71). Calculation of an albumin adjusted fructosamine result failed to improve the correlation with blood glucose concentrations. The use of fructosamine cannot be recommended as an index of glycaemic control in uraemic patients.
本研究调查了通过电渗或亲和色谱法测量的糖化血红蛋白、果糖胺以及白蛋白校正的果糖胺作为1型糖尿病合并慢性肾衰竭患者血糖控制指标的可靠性。20例尿毒症糖尿病患者参与了研究,其中5例接受保守治疗,6例接受持续性不卧床腹膜透析(CAPD),3例接受血液透析,6例为肾移植受者。将结果与15例肾功能正常的糖尿病患者的结果进行比较。在肾病患者中,通过电渗法(r = 0.45;p = 0.04)或亲和色谱法(r = 0.57;p = 0.01)测量的糖化血红蛋白与前6周的平均毛细血管血糖浓度之间存在显著相关性。肾衰竭患者和肾功能正常患者的回归方程无显著差异,这表明每组患者糖化血红蛋白结果的解释范围可以相似。血液透析患者可能是个例外;有证据表明,此类患者的糖化血红蛋白可能会低得具有误导性。果糖胺与肾功能正常患者前一周测量的平均血糖浓度显著相关(r = 0.75;p = 0.001),但与慢性肾衰竭患者无关(r = -0.1;p = 0.71)。计算白蛋白校正的果糖胺结果未能改善与血糖浓度的相关性。不推荐将果糖胺用作尿毒症患者血糖控制的指标。