RR may act as a preferential capsaicin antagonist in the pig nasal mucosa in vivo. However, the present data reveal a narrow concentration range for the selective actions of RR. Moreover, RR has systemic cardiovascular side effects despite local i.a. infusion in the IMA. 2. Acoustic rhinometry is a useful method for investigations of changes in nasal cavity volume in the pig in vivo. 3. The NK1-receptor antagonist RP-67,580 lacks NK1-receptor blocking properties in the pig in vivo. In contrast, CP-96,345 and SR 140.333 significantly blocked SP-mediated vascular effects in the pig nasal mucosa and superficial skin, indicating species dependent NK1-receptor selectivity. Capsaicin-induced vasodilatation in the IMA was not attenuated after administration of CP-96,345 and SR 140.333 whereas the superficial blood flow in the nasal mucosa and skin was slightly reduced. The CGRP-receptor antagonist hCGRP 8-37 markedly reduced the capsaicin-evoked vascular effects in the pig nasal mucosa and superficial skin. 4. Vanilloid receptors, as revealed by 3H-RTX binding, are present in the pig nasal mucosa although with different characteristics compared to vanilloid receptors in the pig dorsal horn. Capsaicin, RTX and LA evoked vasodilatation in the pig nasal mucosa in a similar fashion, indicating activation of sensory nerves. The LA (proton)-evoked vasodilatation was significantly attenuated after local i.a. infusion of hCGRP 8-37, closely resembling the results obtained from the capsaicin challenge before and after CGRP-receptor blockade. Capsazepine did not reduce the capsaicin-and LA-evoked vasodilation in the pig nasal mucosa. This agrees well with the observation that capsazepine did not inhibit RTX binding to vanilloid receptors in pig nasal mucosal membranes. 5. Capsaicin desensitisation of the human nasal mucosa attenuated the subjective pain response as well as the reduction of the cross-sectional area in the nasal cavity evoked by LA and hypertonic saline. This finding gives further support to the hypothesis that protons may act as endogenous ligands to the vanilloid receptor also in man. 6. Systemic administration of the NOS inhibitor L-NNA significantly reduced basal nasal V Con and increased C Vol in the pig. The effects evoked by L-NNA were similar in magnitude to those of phenylephrine and UK 14304, although of much longer duration. Administration of L-NNA did not reduce the vasodilator responses to SP and ACh, suggesting that these substances may mediate their vascular effects via one or several other mechanisms beside the NO/cGMP pathway. Moreover, capsaicin-, VIP-, and nitroprusside-evoked vasodilatation was not reduced after NOS inhibition. 7. Heavy physical exercise and alpha-adrenoceptor agonists reduce nasal cavity NO levels acutely in man. This may be due to a reduced supply of substrates for NO synthesis in the paranasal sinus epithelium, the primary NO production site in the upper airways. However, prolonged use of the alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist oxymetazoline for 10 days, did not reduce basal nasal cavity NO levels. Nasal cavity NO levels and C Vol were not altered after topical administration of the NOS inhibitor L-NAME. Nor did we see any change in C Vol after local challenge with NO gas in the nasal cavity. The present results indicate that the human nasal mucosa is largely insensitive to NO gas in contrast to the bronchial mucosa and lung. 9. In conclusion, the present results suggest that vanilloid receptors are present on sensory nerves in the pig nasal mucosa and that LA (protons) may act as an endogenous ligand to this receptor. Sensory neuropeptides, especially CGRP, may be of importance for nasal congestion upon sensory nerve activation. Hence, selective, non-peptide CGRP-receptor antagonists may be of potential use in nasal disorders characterised by nasal congestion. NO is of importance for basal nasal vascular regulation. However, whether NOS inhibitors have potential as useful nasal de
