Rayner S A, Buckley R J
Immunology Department, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England.
Drug Saf. 1996 May;14(5):273-6. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199614050-00001.
The question of a link between the use of topical ocular chloramphenicol and the incidence of aplastic anaemia continues to be a controversial issue in ophthalmological spheres. At present topical ocular chloramphenicol is widely used in the UK for the treatment of conjunctivitis, whereas it is very rarely prescribed for this indication in the U.S. Individual policies vary around the rest of the world. The evidence for and against any association between topical and ocular chloramphenicol and an increased risk of aplastic anaemia is reviewed, and the reasons behind the current prescribing policies are clarified. The discussion generated in the literature over the past 2 years over this issue is considered, along with the published debate from the past 3 decades. The debate is not conclusive, but by presenting or referencing the specific case reports and the published opinions of various experts, we hope to enable the reader to make his or her own informed decision as to whether use of the topical preparation of chloramphenicol should be considered by the ophthalmological community.
局部使用眼部氯霉素与再生障碍性贫血发病率之间是否存在关联的问题,在眼科领域仍是一个有争议的话题。目前,局部使用眼部氯霉素在英国被广泛用于治疗结膜炎,而在美国,这种药物很少因该适应症而被处方。世界其他地区的个人用药政策各不相同。本文回顾了支持和反对局部使用眼部氯霉素与再生障碍性贫血风险增加之间存在关联的证据,并阐明了当前处方政策背后的原因。同时考虑了过去两年文献中关于这个问题的讨论,以及过去三十年已发表的辩论。这场辩论尚无定论,但通过呈现或引用具体病例报告以及各位专家已发表的观点,我们希望能让读者就是否应考虑使用氯霉素局部制剂,自行做出明智的决定。