Forbat S M, Sakrana M A, Darasz K H, El-Demerdash F, Underwood S R
Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
Br J Radiol. 1996 Mar;69(819):221-5. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-69-819-221.
MRI is an established and accurate method of measuring left and right ventricular volumes by summing chamber areas in multiple contiguous slices. Acquisition time may be up to 45 min. We have estimated volumes with gradient echo imaging to test the accuracy of a more rapid method (total acquisition time 15 min) using a recognized echocardiographic algorithm. The results were compared with the spin echo method. We studied 20 patients (mean age 52 years, 15 male) within 6 months of anterior myocardial infarction and 20 normal subjects (mean age 40 years, 19 males). For the rapid method, cine acquisitions were made in the horizontal long axis plane and in two short axis planes which divided the long axis into three equal parts. Volume was calculated assuming the ventricle to be composed of a cylinder, a truncated cone and a cone. There was good agreement between the two methods at end diastole with a mean difference (+/- standard error, +/- 95% confidence interval for limits of agreement) of -3 ml (+/- 8.3, +/- 37%) for normal subjects and 1.5 ml (+/- 4.2, +/- 25%) for patients. Agreement was less good at end systole with mean difference of 12.1 (+/- 3.5, +/- 41%) for normal subjects and 25.7 (+/- 3.7, +/- 47%) for patients. The rapid method, therefore, significantly underestimated end systolic volume compared with the previous method. Rapid measurements of end diastolic volume are more accurate than those of end systolic volume and hence ejection fraction. Provided the potential error is recognized, the rapid technique can be used in routine clinical practice in both normal and abnormal ventricles.
磁共振成像(MRI)是一种成熟且准确的测量左、右心室容积的方法,通过对多个连续层面的腔室面积求和来实现。采集时间可能长达45分钟。我们使用公认的超声心动图算法,通过梯度回波成像来估计容积,以测试一种更快速方法(总采集时间15分钟)的准确性。将结果与自旋回波方法进行比较。我们研究了20例前壁心肌梗死患者(平均年龄52岁,15例男性)和20例正常受试者(平均年龄40岁,19例男性),时间在心肌梗死后6个月内。对于快速方法,在水平长轴平面和两个将长轴分为三等份的短轴平面进行电影采集。假设心室由一个圆柱体、一个截头圆锥体和一个圆锥体组成来计算容积。两种方法在舒张末期有良好的一致性,正常受试者的平均差异(±标准误差,一致性界限的±95%置信区间)为-3毫升(±8.3,±37%),患者为1.5毫升(±4.2,±25%)。在收缩末期一致性较差,正常受试者的平均差异为12.1(±3.5,±41%),患者为25.7(±3.7,±47%)。因此,与之前的方法相比,快速方法显著低估了收缩末期容积。舒张末期容积的快速测量比收缩末期容积以及射血分数的测量更准确。只要认识到潜在误差,快速技术可用于正常和异常心室的常规临床实践。