Suppr超能文献

前壁心肌梗死后左心室容积的测量:磁共振成像、超声心动图和放射性核素心室造影的比较。

Measurement of left ventricular volume after anterior myocardial infarction: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, echocardiography, and radionuclide ventriculography.

作者信息

Darasz K H, Underwood S R, Bayliss J, Forbat S M, Keegan J, Poole-Wilson P A, Sutton G C, Pennell D

机构信息

Imperial College School of Medicine at National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2002 Apr;18(2):135-42. doi: 10.1023/a:1014685430873.

Abstract

We have compared echocardiography (echo) and radionuclide ventriculography (RNV) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the measurement of left ventricular (LV) volume and ejection fraction. Seventy asymptomatic patients were studied up to 12 days after first Q wave anterior myocardial infarction and again after 6 months. Each patient had LV volume measured by all three techniques within 24 hours of each other on each occasion. LV end-systolic and end-diastolic volume index (LVESVI and LVEDVI) and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) were measured using the modified Simpson formula (echo), a counts-based method (RNV), and a multislice area summation method (MRI). Radionuclide volumes were measured both with and without correction for attenuation of isotope. Echocardiography overestimated LV volume compared with MRI. Mean (SD) differences (echo-MRI) were: LVEDVI + 10.6 ml/m2 (16.8), LVESVI + 13.7 ml/m2 (12.9), LVEF -8.5% (11.2). RNV underestimated both volume and ejection fraction compared with MRI. Mean differences (RNV-MRI) were: LVEDVI -25.4 ml/m2 (23.8), LVESVI -5.0 ml/m2 (18.6), LVEF -13.8% (10.4). Variability in the difference between echo and MRI and between RNV and MRI was very similar for LVEF (coefficient of variation 23.9% echo, 22.2% RNV) but there was greater variability in the radionuclide than the echo measurements of absolute volume. Variability of the radionuclide measurements was reduced by not correcting for attenuation, and this finding may improve the radionuclide technique for serial measurements of percentage change in volume. Long-term inter-study reproducibility of MRI for LVEF (coefficient of reproducibility) was 10.9%, for echo it was 10.6%, and for RNV it was 14.6%. We conclude that measurements of LV volume depend on the method used and are not interchangeable. Echocardiography agrees more closely with MRI than RNV for the measurement of absolute volume, but the two techniques are similar for the measurement of LVEF.

摘要

我们比较了超声心动图(echo)、放射性核素心室造影(RNV)与磁共振成像(MRI)在测量左心室(LV)容积和射血分数方面的差异。对70例无症状患者在首次Q波前壁心肌梗死后12天内及6个月后进行了研究。每次检查时,每位患者均在24小时内通过这三种技术测量LV容积。采用改良Simpson公式(echo)、基于计数的方法(RNV)和多层面积求和法(MRI)测量LV收缩末期和舒张末期容积指数(LVESVI和LVEDVI)以及LV射血分数(LVEF)。放射性核素容积测量时校正和未校正同位素衰减两种情况均进行了测量。与MRI相比,超声心动图高估了LV容积。平均(标准差)差异(echo - MRI)为:LVEDVI + 10.6 ml/m²(16.8),LVESVI + 13.7 ml/m²(12.9),LVEF -8.5%(11.2)。与MRI相比,RNV低估了容积和射血分数。平均差异(RNV - MRI)为:LVEDVI -25.4 ml/m²(23.8),LVESVI -5.0 ml/m²(18.6),LVEF -13.8%(10.4)。对于LVEF,echo与MRI之间以及RNV与MRI之间差异的变异性非常相似(变异系数:echo为23.9%,RNV为22.2%),但放射性核素测量绝对容积时的变异性大于echo测量。不校正衰减可降低放射性核素测量的变异性,这一发现可能会改善放射性核素技术在连续测量容积百分比变化方面的应用。MRI测量LVEF的长期研究间再现性(再现性系数)为10.9%,echo为10.6%,RNV为14.6%。我们得出结论,LV容积的测量取决于所使用的方法,且这些方法不可互换。在测量绝对容积方面,超声心动图与MRI的一致性比RNV更高,但在测量LVEF方面,这两种技术相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验