Vigna C, Perna G P, Pacilli M A, De Rito V, Russo A, Salvatori M P, Lanna P, Langialonga T, Fanelli R, Loperfido F
Divisione di Cardiologia, Ospedale Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo.
G Ital Cardiol. 1996 Jun;26(6):639-46.
Chronic heart failure leads to renal hypoperfusion. Clinical methods for monitoring renal artery flow have several limitations. We analyzed the renal artery flow-velocity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and normal controls by pulsed-wave (PW) color-guided Doppler technique. The relation between PW Doppler quantitative indexes and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), creatinine clearance, and age, was also assessed.
We studied 53 patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF by 2D echo < or = 40%) and no systemic hypertension, diabetes, parenchymal nephropathy, serum creatinine levels > 150 mmol/l, nor renal artery stenosis. Five patients were excluded for suboptimal renal artery PW Doppler recordings. Thus, the study group was constituted of 48 patients (mean age: 64 +/- 13 years). Twenty-eight normal subjects (mean age: 61 +/- 9 years) were the control group. By PW Doppler we measured the maximum (Vmax), the minimum (Vmin) and the mean (Vmean) velocities of both renal arteries. The resistivity index (RI), obtained from the formula (Vmax-Vmin)/ Vmax, and the pulsatility index (PI), obtained from the formula (Vmax-Vmin)/Vmed were calculated. Creatinine clearance was determined in each patient.
RI and PI were greater in patients with left ventricular dysfunction than in normal controls. In normal controls, RI and PI were related to age (r: 0.63, p < 0.001; and r: 0.45, p < 0.05) and creatinine clearance (r: -0.44 and -0.40, respectively; both: p < 0.05), not to LVEF. In patients with left ventricular dysfunction, RI and PI were related to LVEF (r: -0.67 and -0.59; both: p < 0.001), other than to age (r: 0.57 and 0.55; both: p < 0.001) and creatinine clearance (r: -0.59, p < 0.001, and r = -0.46, p < 0.01, respectively). In this group, however, there was no sharp separation of RI and PI between patients with different degree of left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF < or = 30% and > 30%).
In patients with left ventricular dysfunction, by renal artery PW Doppler analysis it is possible to detect noninvasively a reduction in regional flow-velocity and an increase in Doppler-derived vascular resistance indexes. These Doppler changes mainly depend on severity of left ventricular dysfunction and less on age of patients.
慢性心力衰竭会导致肾灌注不足。监测肾动脉血流的临床方法存在若干局限性。我们采用脉冲波(PW)彩色引导多普勒技术分析了左心室功能不全患者及正常对照者的肾动脉血流速度。还评估了PW多普勒定量指标与左心室射血分数(LVEF)、肌酐清除率及年龄之间的关系。
我们研究了53例左心室功能不全(二维超声心动图测得的LVEF≤40%)且无系统性高血压、糖尿病、实质性肾病、血清肌酐水平>150 mmol/L或肾动脉狭窄的患者。5例因肾动脉PW多普勒记录不理想而被排除。因此,研究组由48例患者组成(平均年龄:64±13岁)。28名正常受试者(平均年龄:61±9岁)作为对照组。通过PW多普勒测量双侧肾动脉的最大(Vmax)、最小(Vmin)和平均(Vmean)速度。计算由公式(Vmax - Vmin)/Vmax得出的阻力指数(RI)以及由公式(Vmax - Vmin)/Vmed得出的搏动指数(PI)。测定每位患者的肌酐清除率。
左心室功能不全患者的RI和PI高于正常对照组。在正常对照组中,RI和PI与年龄相关(r:0.63,p<0.001;r:0.45,p<0.05)以及与肌酐清除率相关(分别为r:-0.44和-0.40;均为p<0.05),与LVEF无关。在左心室功能不全患者中,RI和PI与LVEF相关(r:-0.67和-0.59;均为p<0.001),与年龄(r:0.57和0.55;均为p<0.001)和肌酐清除率(分别为r:-0.59,p<0.001,r = -0.46,p<0.01)也相关。然而,在该组中,不同程度左心室功能不全(LVEF≤30%和>30%)的患者之间RI和PI没有明显区分。
对于左心室功能不全患者,通过肾动脉PW多普勒分析能够无创检测到局部血流速度降低以及多普勒衍生的血管阻力指数升高。这些多普勒变化主要取决于左心室功能不全的严重程度,而较少取决于患者年龄。