Hamill O P, McBride D W
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555-0641, USA.
Pharmacol Rev. 1996 Jun;48(2):231-52.
In this article, the actions, mechanisms and applications of various ions and drugs that interact with MG channels have been discussed. At present, no compound has been found that displays the high specificity and affinity exhibited by tetrodotoxin or alpha-bungarotoxin that proved so useful in the functional and structural characterization of the voltage-gated Na+ channel and the acetylcholine receptor channel, respectively. Nevertheless, three different classes of compounds have been discovered since Paintal's review that clearly block MG channels. These compounds, represented by amiloride, gentamicin and gadolinium, act mainly on the SA cation channel, which appears to be shared by many nonsensory and some mechanosensory cells. Each class of compound can be distinguished by the voltage and concentration dependence of the block and most likely involves different mechanisms of blocking action. In general, the MG channel blocker pharmacology indicates a variety of "receptor sites" on MG channels. The recognition and acceptance of such receptors should provide added impetus for continued screening for more potent drugs, venoms and toxins. In the case of activators, little is understood of the mechanisms by which the various amphipathic and amphiphilic compounds stimulate MG channels, although different bilayer and protein mechanisms have been evoked. Even less is understood of the role the new class of MG K+ channel and their modulation by fatty acids plays in physiological and perhaps pathological processes. However, given that K+ channels in general tend to reduce the excitability of nerve and muscle, plausible roles include fatty acid regulation of vascular tone and control of neuronal network excitability. In both cases, more detailed understanding is required regarding the physiological stimuli that modulate these channels through their fatty acid receptors. It may turn out that recognition and/or development of cell-type specific agents that activate such MG channels will possess high therapeutic potential. In any case, the observation that MG channels can be chemically blocked and/or activated by a wide range of compounds requires revision of the long-standing conclusion of Paintal that mechanotransduction is a process that has a low susceptibility to chemical influence.
在本文中,已讨论了与机械门控通道(MG通道)相互作用的各种离子和药物的作用、机制及应用。目前,尚未发现有化合物能表现出河豚毒素或α-银环蛇毒素所具有的高特异性和亲和力,这两种毒素分别在电压门控Na⁺通道和乙酰胆碱受体通道的功能及结构表征中发挥了重要作用。然而,自潘塔尔(Paintal)的综述发表以来,已发现三类不同的化合物可明确阻断MG通道。这些以氨氯吡咪、庆大霉素和钆为代表的化合物,主要作用于SA阳离子通道,许多非感觉细胞和一些机械感觉细胞似乎都有这种通道。每类化合物可通过阻断作用的电压和浓度依赖性来区分,且很可能涉及不同的阻断作用机制。总体而言,MG通道阻滞剂药理学表明MG通道上存在多种“受体位点”。对这类受体的认识和接受,应为持续筛选更有效的药物、毒液和毒素提供额外动力。就激活剂而言,尽管已提出不同的双层和蛋白质机制,但对于各种两亲性和双亲水性化合物刺激MG通道的机制,人们了解甚少。对于新型MG钾通道及其受脂肪酸调节在生理及可能的病理过程中所起的作用,了解更少。然而,鉴于一般来说钾通道往往会降低神经和肌肉的兴奋性,合理的作用可能包括脂肪酸对血管张力的调节以及对神经网络兴奋性的控制。在这两种情况下,都需要更详细地了解通过其脂肪酸受体调节这些通道的生理刺激因素。结果可能是,识别和/或开发激活此类MG通道的细胞类型特异性药物将具有很高的治疗潜力。无论如何,MG通道可被多种化合物化学阻断和/或激活这一观察结果,需要修正潘塔尔长期以来的结论,即机械转导是一个对化学影响敏感性较低的过程。