Blair R C, Troendle J F, Beck R W
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa 33612-3805, USA.
Stat Med. 1996 Jun 15;15(11):1107-21. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960615)15:11<1107::AID-SIM222>3.0.CO;2-T.
We describe permutation based sequentially rejective multiple comparison procedures useful in multiple endpoint assessments. We used Monte Carlo methods to compare the power of these newly devised tests to that of tests due to Holm and Rom as well as to the classical Bonferroni method. We illustrate applications of the methods with analysis of visual field data collected from optic neuritis patients. We conclude that the new methods are particularly useful when there are many endpoints involved, the data are significantly correlated, and/or the distributional assumptions are questionable.
我们描述了基于排列的序贯拒绝多重比较程序,这些程序在多个终点评估中很有用。我们使用蒙特卡罗方法将这些新设计的检验的功效与霍尔姆(Holm)和罗姆(Rom)检验以及经典的邦费罗尼(Bonferroni)方法的功效进行比较。我们通过分析从视神经炎患者收集的视野数据来说明这些方法的应用。我们得出结论,当涉及许多终点、数据显著相关和/或分布假设存在疑问时,新方法特别有用。