Suppr超能文献

儿童乳糜泻与Ⅰ型(胰岛素依赖型)糖尿病:随访研究

Celiac disease and type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in childhood: follow-up study.

作者信息

Lorini R, Scotta M S, Cortona L, Avanzini M A, Vitali L, De Giacomo C, Scaramuzza A, Severi F

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, University of Pavia, Policlinico San Matteo I.R.C.C.S., Italy.

出版信息

J Diabetes Complications. 1996 May-Jun;10(3):154-9. doi: 10.1016/1056-8727(96)00056-6.

Abstract

To ascertain the specificity of IgA and IgG antigliadin (IgA-AGA, IgG-AGA), IgA-antireticulin (R1-ARA), and antiendomysial (AEA) antibodies for the diagnosis of celiac disease, we evaluated 133 type I diabetic children aged 1.4-28.4 years (mean 14.1 +/- 6.6), with diabetes from onset to 20.5 years. Fifty-three patients were considered at onset and 49 of these also during follow-up. IgA-AGA and IgG-AGA were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), R1-ARA and AEA by indirect immunofluorescence. IgA-AGA were positive in 20 of 133 (15%), IgG-AGA were positive in seven of 133 (5.26%), while R1-ARA and AEA were positive in three patients. At the onset of disease we found elevated IgA-AGA in 17 of 53 (32%) patients, IgG-AGA in four (7.55%) patients, three of them with IgA-AGA as well; R1-ARA and AEA were present in three (5.66%) patients, all with high IgA-AGA levels. During 1-10 year follow-up IgA-AGA decreased to within the normal range in 13 patients, with elevated IgA-AGA at onset but without R1-ARA and AEA; in four patients with high IgA-AGA at onset, IgA-AGA remained constantly elevated as did R1-ARA and AEA in three of them; and two patients, without IgA-AGA, R1-ARA, and AEA at onset, became positive for all three antibodies. Intestinal biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of celiac disease in five of these with IgA-AGA, R1-ARA, and AEA, but not in one patient with persistent IgA-AGA but no AEA and R1-ARA, suggesting that R1-ARA and AEA are more reliable markers for the screening of celiac disease in type I diabetic patients.

摘要

为确定IgA和IgG抗麦醇溶蛋白抗体(IgA-AGA、IgG-AGA)、IgA抗网硬蛋白抗体(R1-ARA)及抗肌内膜抗体(AEA)对乳糜泻诊断的特异性,我们评估了133例1.4至28.4岁(平均14.1±6.6岁)的I型糖尿病儿童,其糖尿病病程从发病至20.5年。53例患者在发病时接受评估,其中49例在随访期间也接受了评估。IgA-AGA和IgG-AGA通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测,R1-ARA和AEA通过间接免疫荧光检测。133例中有20例(15%)IgA-AGA呈阳性,133例中有7例(5.26%)IgG-AGA呈阳性,而3例患者R1-ARA和AEA呈阳性。在疾病发病时,我们发现53例患者中有17例(32%)IgA-AGA升高,4例(7.55%)患者IgG-AGA升高,其中3例同时伴有IgA-AGA升高;3例(5.66%)患者存在R1-ARA和AEA,均伴有高IgA-AGA水平。在1至10年的随访中,13例发病时IgA-AGA升高但无R1-ARA和AEA的患者,其IgA-AGA降至正常范围;4例发病时IgA-AGA高的患者中,3例患者的IgA-AGA持续升高,R1-ARA和AEA也持续升高;2例发病时无IgA-AGA、R1-ARA和AEA的患者,这三种抗体均转为阳性。肠道活检证实,5例伴有IgA-AGA、R1-ARA和AEA的患者患有乳糜泻,但1例持续存在IgA-AGA但无AEA和R1-ARA的患者未患乳糜泻,这表明R1-ARA和AEA是I型糖尿病患者筛查乳糜泻更可靠的标志物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验