Wilson B W, Lee G M, Yost M G, Davis K C, Heimbigner T, Buschbom R L
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, USA.
Bioelectromagnetics. 1996;17(3):174-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1996)17:3<174::AID-BEM2>3.0.CO;2-0.
Measurements of the flux density and spectra of magnetic fields (MFs) generated by several types of electric bed heaters (EBH) were made in order to characterize the MFs to which the fetus may be exposed in utero from the mother's use of these devices. Data on MPs were gathered from more than 1,300 in-home and laboratory spot measurements. In-home measurements taken at seven different positions 10 cm from the EBHs determined that the mean flux density at the estimated position of the fetus relative to the device was 0.45 microT (4.5 mG) for electric blankets and 0.20 microT (2.0 mG) for electrically heated water beds. A rate-of-change (RC) metric applied to the nighttime segment of 24 h EMDEX-C personal-dosimeter measurements, which were taken next to the bed of volunteers, yielded an approximate fourfold to sixfold higher value for electric blanket users compared to water-bed heater users. These same data records yielded an approximate twofold difference for the same measurements when evaluated by the time-weighted-average (TWA)MF exposure metric. Performance of exposure meters was checked against standard fields generated in the laboratory, and studies of sources of variance in the in-home measurement protocols were carried out. Spectral measurements showed that the EBH's measured produced no appreciable high-frequency MFs. Data gathered during this work will be used in interpreting results from a component of the California Pregnancy Outcome Study, which evaluates the use of EBHs as a possible risk factor in miscarriage.
为了描述胎儿在子宫内可能因母亲使用几种类型的电热床加热器(EBH)而暴露于其中的磁场(MF),对这些设备产生的磁通密度和磁场频谱进行了测量。从1300多次家庭和实验室现场测量中收集了有关磁场的数据。在距离EBH 10厘米的七个不同位置进行的家庭测量确定,相对于该设备,胎儿估计位置处的平均磁通密度,电热毯为0.45微特斯拉(4.5毫高斯),电热水床为0.20微特斯拉(2.0毫高斯)。应用于在志愿者床边进行的24小时EMDEX - C个人剂量计夜间测量部分的变化率(RC)指标显示,电热毯使用者的值比水床加热器使用者高出约四倍至六倍。当通过时间加权平均(TWA)磁场暴露指标进行评估时,相同的数据记录在相同测量中产生了约两倍的差异。对照实验室产生的标准场检查了暴露计的性能,并对家庭测量方案中的方差来源进行了研究。频谱测量表明,所测量的EBH没有产生明显的高频磁场。在这项工作中收集的数据将用于解释加利福尼亚州妊娠结局研究的一个组成部分的结果,该研究评估EBH的使用作为流产的一个可能风险因素。