Suppr超能文献

普通牙科实践中手工处理与自动处理的比较。

A comparison of manual and automatic processing in general dental practice.

作者信息

Rout P G, Rogers S N, Chapman M, Rippin J W

机构信息

Unit of Radiology, Birmingham Dental School and Hospital.

出版信息

Br Dent J. 1996 Aug 10;181(3):99-101. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809171.

Abstract

Although automatic processing is becoming more widely available in general dental practice, there is little objective information regarding the quality of this type of processing. Thus a postal study was undertaken to compare manual and automatic processing using a questionnaire together with a standardised, pre-exposed test radiograph for routine processing. Analysis of variance showed significant differences between the manually processed, automatically processed and control test films, in respect of D Min (P < 0.001), test strip (P < 0.001), and step density values (P < 0.01) but not for D Max (P > 0.1). The manually processed test films generally had significantly less density than the automatically processed test films or control test films.

摘要

虽然自动冲洗技术在一般牙科诊所中越来越普及,但关于这种冲洗类型的质量,客观信息却很少。因此,我们开展了一项邮寄调查,通过问卷以及一张用于常规冲洗的标准化预曝光测试X光片,对手动冲洗和自动冲洗进行比较。方差分析显示,在最小密度(D Min,P < 0.001)、测试条(P < 0.001)和梯级密度值(P < 0.01)方面,手动冲洗的测试胶片、自动冲洗的测试胶片和对照测试胶片之间存在显著差异,但最大密度(D Max,P > 0.1)方面没有差异。手动冲洗的测试胶片的密度通常显著低于自动冲洗的测试胶片或对照测试胶片。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验