Yokota Y
Kobe University School of Medicine.
J Cardiol. 1996 Aug;28(2):99-112.
Over the past 20 years, the concept of chronic heart failure has changed. The activation of neurohumoral system is important in worsening the chronic heart failure. Therefore, it is reasonable to block the effect of the renin-angiotensin system and sympathetic nervous system on the heart for treatment of heart failure. Many studies have demonstrated that angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce the level of angiotensin II and plasma norepinephrine, and improve long-term hemodynamics and survival in patients with chronic heart failure. However, despite the wide use of ACE inhibitors, the prognosis of chronic heart failure remains poor. Although beta-blockers can block the effect of sympathetic nervous system activity, these agents had not been used for the treatment of chronic heart failure because of its negative inotropic action. In 1975, Waagstein and associates described functional improvement in seven patients receiving beta-blockers. Subsequently, many workers have examined the therapeutic efficacy of beta-blockers in the treatment of chronic heart failure. Eleven studies reported the long-term effect of beta 1-selective beta-blocker without intrinsic sympathetic activity including metoprolol and bisoprolol, and 14 studies were performed using beta-blockers with vasodilator properties including bucindolol and carvedilol. These studies predominantly included patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, although some also included patients with ischemic heart disease. Most but not all of these studies showed beneficial effects on symptoms, hemodynamics and morbidity in both dilated cardiomyopathy and ischemic heart disease. Vasodilating beta-blockers may provide an additional useful effect compared to beta-blockers without vasodilator properties. However, direct comparisons between beta-blockers with and without vasodilator properties on clinical efficacy have not yet been made. The effect of beta-blockers on survival was investigated in five controlled trials. Although these studies suggested a beneficial effect of beta-blockers on survival in chronic heart failure, the effect has not yet been conclusively determined especially in patients with chronic heart failure due to ischemic heart disease. Some investigators are proposing the use of beta-blockers in chronic heart failure to ameliorate the harmful effect of excess sympathetic stimulation, but the exact mechanisms of beta-blockers are uncertain. Although a large number of studies have demonstrated the usefulness of beta-blocker treatment for chronic heart failure, many unsolved problems such as the exact mechanisms of beneficial effect, usefulness for ischemic heart disease, and the optimal agent and dose for treatment remain. Further studies are needed to establish this treatment.
在过去20年里,慢性心力衰竭的概念已经发生了变化。神经体液系统的激活在慢性心力衰竭的恶化过程中起着重要作用。因此,阻断肾素-血管紧张素系统和交感神经系统对心脏的作用来治疗心力衰竭是合理的。许多研究表明,血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂可降低血管紧张素II水平和血浆去甲肾上腺素水平,并改善慢性心力衰竭患者的长期血流动力学和生存率。然而,尽管ACE抑制剂被广泛使用,但慢性心力衰竭的预后仍然很差。虽然β受体阻滞剂可以阻断交感神经系统活动的作用,但由于其负性肌力作用,这些药物尚未用于治疗慢性心力衰竭。1975年,瓦格斯坦及其同事描述了7例接受β受体阻滞剂治疗的患者功能得到改善。随后,许多研究人员研究了β受体阻滞剂治疗慢性心力衰竭的疗效。11项研究报告了无内在交感活性的β1选择性β受体阻滞剂(包括美托洛尔和比索洛尔)的长期效果,14项研究使用了具有血管扩张特性的β受体阻滞剂(包括布新洛尔和卡维地洛)。这些研究主要纳入了扩张型心肌病患者,尽管有些研究也纳入了缺血性心脏病患者。这些研究中的大多数(但不是全部)显示,对扩张型心肌病和缺血性心脏病患者的症状、血流动力学和发病率都有有益影响。与不具有血管扩张特性的β受体阻滞剂相比,具有血管扩张作用的β受体阻滞剂可能会提供额外的有益效果。然而,尚未对具有和不具有血管扩张特性的β受体阻滞剂的临床疗效进行直接比较。在五项对照试验中研究了β受体阻滞剂对生存率的影响。虽然这些研究表明β受体阻滞剂对慢性心力衰竭患者的生存率有有益影响,但这一效果尚未最终确定,尤其是在缺血性心脏病所致慢性心力衰竭患者中。一些研究人员提议在慢性心力衰竭中使用β受体阻滞剂来改善过度交感神经刺激的有害作用,但β受体阻滞剂的确切作用机制尚不清楚。尽管大量研究已经证明β受体阻滞剂治疗慢性心力衰竭的有效性,但仍存在许多未解决的问题,如有益作用的确切机制、对缺血性心脏病的有效性以及治疗的最佳药物和剂量等。需要进一步的研究来确立这种治疗方法。