Effects of procues on error rate and reaction times of antisaccades in human subjects.

In a gap paradigm, where the saccadic reaction times are usually short, the number of express saccades can be further increased and their latency decreased when a valid transient peripheral cue is given 100 ms before target occurrence. In the present study we measured the saccadic reaction times of seven human subjects who had been instructed to make antisaccades (saccades to the side opposite to stimulus presentation) in the gap paradigm. In the first experiment, we presented a 100% valid cue with 100 ms cue lead time. To explore whether the cue reduced the reaction times of the antisaccades, the cue was always presented on the opposite side to where the stimulus occurred (stimulus direction was randomized between 4 degrees to the left and right), and it was thus indicated in each trial to which side the antisaccade was required (procue). In the second set of experiments the cue was consistently presented on either the left or the right side in two different blocks; it was thus noninformative with respect to the direction of the antisaccade. In the first experiment, a significant increase in mean reaction times of correct antisaccades and a considerable increase in erratic prosaccades to the stimulus were obtained compared with a control session with no cue. In the two experimental blocks with noninformative cues, the reaction times of correct antisaccades were decreased when cue and stimulus were on at the same side, while large numbers of erratic prosaccades were again obtained when cue and stimulus were presented on opposite sides. These results suggest that the orienting mechanism elicited by a transient peripheral cue relates to the command and to the decision to make a pro- versus an antisaccade. Since the subjects reported that they could not prevent, or, moreover, in some cases did not even realize that they were making erratic prosaccades, we conclude that this orienting mechanism occurs automatically, being largely beyond voluntary control.