• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[A study of hierarchical structure in personality traits: asymmetry judgments in category breadth and class inclusion].

作者信息

Yamaguchi A, Kawahara T, Hisano M

机构信息

Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education, University of Tokyo.

出版信息

Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1995 Dec;66(5):345-53. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.66.345.

DOI:10.4992/jjpsy.66.345
PMID:8819745
Abstract

Many personality theorists postulate a hierarchical structure in trait words. However, most evidences are indirect, mainly because the theorists rely on factor-analytic methods. Assuming a global structure, the factor approach is not necessarily adequate to investigate concrete relationship among trait words. In this study, we used two direct measures to study the hierarchical structure: direct comparison of breadth and asymmetry class-inclusion judgment on trait concepts. Results of three experiments in general confirmed robustness of the hierarchical structure in the domain of personality traits. Traits were organized in the structure at several different levels of abstractness. But the structure was fuzzy in nature, unlike the taxonomy in biology. It was also found that inter-relations among traits could vary considerably from individual to individual. Cognitive complexity may be one of the variables that explain such an individual difference.

摘要

相似文献

1
[A study of hierarchical structure in personality traits: asymmetry judgments in category breadth and class inclusion].
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1995 Dec;66(5):345-53. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.66.345.
2
Category breadth and hierarchical structure in personality: studies of asymmetries in judgments of trait implications.人格中的类别广度与层次结构:特质含义判断中的不对称性研究
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Jul;51(1):37-54. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.37.
3
How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated?人格量表的内部结构应如何评估?
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010 Aug;14(3):332-46. doi: 10.1177/1088868310361240. Epub 2010 Apr 30.
4
The hierarchical structure of clinician ratings of proposed DSM-5 pathological personality traits.DSM-5 病理性人格特质提议者的临床医生评定的层次结构。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2013 Aug;122(3):836-41. doi: 10.1037/a0034003.
5
[Individual differences in the application of implied personality theories: relationships between cognitive structure and personality traits in female pupils in the 10th class].[第十年级女学生中隐含人格理论应用的个体差异:认知结构与人格特质之间的关系]
Arch Psychol (Frankf). 1975;127(3-4):284-99.
6
Children's implicit personality theories as predictors of their social judgments.儿童的内隐人格理论作为其社会判断的预测因素。
Child Dev. 1993 Jun;64(3):863-78.
7
[The availability of personality traits in the hierarchical structure: an exploration of the "basic level"].层次结构中人格特质的可得性:对“基本层次”的探索
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1996 Aug;67(3):195-203. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.67.195.
8
The role of individual differences in the accuracy of confidence judgments.个体差异在信心判断准确性中的作用。
J Gen Psychol. 2002 Jul;129(3):257-99. doi: 10.1080/00221300209602099.
9
A closer look at the lower-order structure of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5: comparison with the Five-Factor Model.深入探究《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格量表的低阶结构:与五因素模型的比较。
Personal Disord. 2014 Oct;5(4):406-12. doi: 10.1037/per0000074. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
10
The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power.下一个大五人格量表(BFI-2):开发和评估一个具有 15 个方面的层次模型,以提高带宽、保真度和预测能力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jul;113(1):117-143. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000096. Epub 2016 Apr 7.