Terasawa T
Institute of Psychology, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki.
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1996 Jun;67(2):141-6. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.67.141.
It is logically inferred that in a recognition judgment, subjects unconsciously discriminate an experimental episode from past episodes concerning the test item. This implies that the interference effect reported in the list specific recognition task (Anderson & Bower, 1974) must also appear in the standard recognition judgment. This paper investigated the nature of such an interference effect. In the experiment subjects were presented with a target list following non-target lists, and then performed a YES-NO recognition test. Each previously-studied list contained both targets and distracters in a different order. The subjects were divided into four groups according to the number of prior study lists (0, 1, 2, 3). Results indicate that recognition performance deteriorated as the number of prior lists increased. The most important result was that the rate of increase of the interference effect, especially when estimated based on the increment of false alarms, decreased as the number of prior lists increased. This paper calls this phenomenon non-linearity of interference effect.
从逻辑上推断,在识别判断中,受试者会无意识地将一个实验片段与过去关于测试项目的片段区分开来。这意味着在特定列表识别任务中报告的干扰效应(Anderson & Bower,1974)也必然会出现在标准识别判断中。本文研究了这种干扰效应的本质。在实验中,先向受试者呈现非目标列表,然后再呈现目标列表,接着进行“是/否”识别测试。每个之前学习过的列表都以不同顺序包含目标和干扰项。根据之前学习列表的数量(0、1、2、3)将受试者分为四组。结果表明,随着之前列表数量的增加,识别表现会变差。最重要的结果是,干扰效应的增加速率,尤其是基于错误警报的增量来估计时,会随着之前列表数量的增加而降低。本文将这种现象称为干扰效应的非线性。