• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在全身麻醉下经颅高频重复电刺激用于记录肌源性运动诱发电位。

Transcranial high-frequency repetitive electrical stimulation for recording myogenic motor evoked potentials with the patient under general anesthesia.

作者信息

Pechstein U, Cedzich C, Nadstawek J, Schramm J

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 1996 Aug;39(2):335-43; discussion 343-4. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199608000-00020.

DOI:10.1097/00006123-199608000-00020
PMID:8832671
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the feasibility of transcranial high-frequency electrical stimulation with the patient under general anesthesia with propofol and alfentanil. This method may be a useful tool for intraoperative monitoring of the motor pathways during cerebral and spinal operations.

METHODS

A short train from one to eight monopolar anodal electrical pulses was applied transcranially to the motor cortex with a frequency from 100 to 500 Hz in 10 patients. Myogenic motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from forearm flexor muscles, thenar, and hypothenar. Amplitude and latency of MEPs were evaluated after different stimulation parameters. This combination of anesthetic and transcranial stimulation technique allows recording of myogenic MEPs during general anesthesia, which was found not to be possible with single pulse transcranial stimulation.

RESULTS

To elicit myogenic MEPs from the target muscles, stimulation had to be applied within the following parameters: minimum threshold intensity was 60 mA for forearm flexor and thenar and 80 mA for hypothenar; minimum number of pulses was two for forearm flexor muscles and thenar and three for hypothenar; minimum stimulation frequency was 200 Hz for thenar and hypothenar and 100 Hz for forearm flexor muscles.

CONCLUSION

Transcranial high-frequency repetitive electrical stimulation seems to be a new method for monitoring the motor tract. With this method, it is possible to monitor the motor function without interfering with the surgical team or with the surgical treatment of infratentorial and spinal lesions. Monitoring of relaxation is necessary to compare the amplitude of MEPs.

摘要

目的

证明在丙泊酚和阿芬太尼全身麻醉下对患者进行经颅高频电刺激的可行性。该方法可能是脑和脊髓手术中运动通路术中监测的有用工具。

方法

对10例患者经颅向运动皮层施加1至8个单极阳极电脉冲的短串刺激,频率为100至500Hz。从前臂屈肌、大鱼际和小鱼际记录肌源性运动诱发电位(MEP)。在不同刺激参数后评估MEP的幅度和潜伏期。这种麻醉和经颅刺激技术的组合允许在全身麻醉期间记录肌源性MEP,而单脉冲经颅刺激则无法做到这一点。

结果

为了从目标肌肉引出肌源性MEP,刺激必须在以下参数范围内进行:前臂屈肌和大鱼际的最小阈值强度为60mA,小鱼际为80mA;前臂屈肌和大鱼际的最小脉冲数为两个,小鱼际为三个;大鱼际和小鱼际的最小刺激频率为200Hz,前臂屈肌为100Hz。

结论

经颅高频重复电刺激似乎是监测运动通路的一种新方法。通过这种方法,可以在不干扰手术团队或幕下及脊髓病变手术治疗的情况下监测运动功能。监测肌肉松弛对于比较MEP的幅度是必要的。

相似文献

1
Transcranial high-frequency repetitive electrical stimulation for recording myogenic motor evoked potentials with the patient under general anesthesia.在全身麻醉下经颅高频重复电刺激用于记录肌源性运动诱发电位。
Neurosurgery. 1996 Aug;39(2):335-43; discussion 343-4. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199608000-00020.
2
"Threshold-level" multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation of motor cortex for intraoperative monitoring of spinal motor tracts: description of method and comparison to somatosensory evoked potential monitoring.用于脊髓运动束术中监测的运动皮层“阈值水平”多脉冲经颅电刺激:方法描述及与体感诱发电位监测的比较
J Neurosurg. 1998 Mar;88(3):457-70. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.88.3.0457.
3
Intraoperative monitoring of myogenic motor-evoked potentials from the external anal sphincter muscle to transcranial electrical stimulation.术中通过经颅电刺激对肛门外括约肌肌源性运动诱发电位进行监测。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 1;27(21):E454-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200211010-00018.
4
The effects of the neuromuscular blockade levels on amplitudes of posttetanic motor-evoked potentials and movement in response to transcranial stimulation in patients receiving propofol and fentanyl anesthesia.在接受丙泊酚和芬太尼麻醉的患者中,神经肌肉阻滞水平对强直后运动诱发电位幅度及经颅刺激后运动反应的影响。
Anesth Analg. 2008 Mar;106(3):930-4, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181617508.
5
Somatosensory evoked potential phase reversal and direct motor cortex stimulation during surgery in and around the central region.中央区及其周围手术期间的体感诱发电位相位反转和直接运动皮层刺激
Neurosurgery. 1996 May;38(5):962-70. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199605000-00023.
6
Low dose propofol as a supplement to ketamine-based anesthesia during intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potentials.在运动诱发电位术中监测期间,低剂量丙泊酚作为氯胺酮麻醉的补充剂。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Apr 15;25(8):974-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200004150-00013.
7
The effect of hypothermia on myogenic motor-evoked potentials to electrical stimulation with a single pulse and a train of pulses under propofol/ketamine/fentanyl anesthesia in rabbits.在兔丙泊酚/氯胺酮/芬太尼麻醉下,低温对单次脉冲和脉冲串电刺激诱发的肌源性运动诱发电位的影响。
Anesth Analg. 2003 Jun;96(6):1692-1697. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000064202.24119.07.
8
The application of tetanic stimulation of the unilateral tibial nerve before transcranial stimulation can augment the amplitudes of myogenic motor-evoked potentials from the muscles in the bilateral upper and lower limbs.在经颅刺激前对单侧胫神经进行强直刺激,可增强双侧上肢和下肢肌肉的肌源性运动诱发电位的波幅。
Anesth Analg. 2008 Jul;107(1):215-20. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318177082e.
9
Intraoperative myogenic motor evoked potentials induced by direct electrical stimulation of the exposed motor cortex under isoflurane and sevoflurane.在异氟烷和七氟烷麻醉下,通过直接电刺激暴露的运动皮层诱发术中肌源性运动诱发电位。
Anesth Analg. 1996 Mar;82(3):593-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199603000-00029.
10
Transcranial electrical stimulation through screw electrodes for intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials. Technical note.通过螺丝钉电极进行经颅电刺激用于运动诱发电位的术中监测。技术说明。
J Neurosurg. 2004 Jan;100(1):155-60. doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.100.1.0155.

引用本文的文献

1
Awake Craniotomy for the Excision of a Pediatric Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformation for Language Preservation: A Case Description.清醒开颅手术切除小儿脑动静脉畸形以保留语言功能:病例描述
J Pers Med. 2025 Jul 15;15(7):319. doi: 10.3390/jpm15070319.
2
Feasibility and optimal choice of stimulation parameters for supramaximal stimulation of motor evoked potentials.运动诱发电位超强刺激的可行性及最佳刺激参数选择。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Jun;37(3):783-793. doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00972-5. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
3
Motor Evoked Potential Warning Criteria in Supratentorial Surgery: A Scoping Review.
幕上手术中运动诱发电位的预警标准:一项范围综述
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 4;13(11):2803. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112803.
4
The perspectives of mapping and monitoring of the sense of self in neurosurgical patients.神经外科患者自我意识的映射和监测视角。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 May;163(5):1213-1226. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04778-3. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
5
Tetanic stimulation of the peripheral nerve augments motor evoked potentials by re-exciting spinal anterior horn cells.对周围神经进行强直刺激可通过再次激发脊髓前角细胞来增强运动诱发电位。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Feb;36(1):259-270. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00647-z. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
6
Monophasic transcranial constant-current versus constant-voltage stimulation of motor-evoked potentials during spinal surgery.单相经颅恒流与恒压刺激运动诱发电位在脊柱手术中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 7;9(1):3773. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39883-y.
7
Direct Cortical Motor Evoked Potentials Versus Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials for the Detection of Cortical Ischemia During Supratentorial Craniotomy: Case Report.幕上开颅术中直接皮质运动诱发电位与经颅运动诱发电位检测皮质缺血的比较:病例报告
Cureus. 2018 Dec 24;10(12):e3771. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3771.
8
Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring : A Review of Techniques Used for Brain Tumor Surgery in Children.术中神经生理监测:儿童脑肿瘤手术所用技术综述
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2018 May;61(3):363-375. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2018.0078. Epub 2018 May 1.
9
Four-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation using multiple conditioning inputs. Normative MEP responses.使用多个条件输入的四脉冲经颅磁刺激。正常运动诱发电位反应。
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Apr;236(4):1205-1218. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5212-8. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
10
False-Positive and False-Negative Results of Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring During Surgery for Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors.脊髓髓内肿瘤手术中运动诱发电位监测的假阳性和假阴性结果。
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2018 Mar 1;14(3):279-287. doi: 10.1093/ons/opx113.