Cedzich C, Taniguchi M, Schäfer S, Schramm J
Neurosurgical Clinic, Südklinikum Nürnberg, Germany.
Neurosurgery. 1996 May;38(5):962-70. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199605000-00023.
In 99 patients with mass lesions in and around the central region, the central sulcus was intraoperatively localized with the use of somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) phase reversal. In 33 of these patients, the motor cortex was directly stimulated and electromyographic responses were recorded from the forearm flexor, thenar, and hypothenar muscles. An additional 25 patients, with subcortical lesions or lesions directly located at the pyramidal tract, were continuously monitored during surgery by motor evoked potentials (MEPs). An exact determination of the central sulcus and tumor localization was possible in all patients; a phase reversal was obtained in 90.8% of the patients, and localization was possible as a result of anatomic structures and the loss of N20 or P20 of SEPs in the other 9.2%. MEPs were obtained in 32 of 33 patients and also in all 25 patients who underwent MEP monitoring at the beginning of tumor removal. From this study, it can be concluded that the combination of SEP phase reversal and modified electrical cortex stimulation is compatible with general anesthesia, although anesthesia was not systematically controlled according to a protocol. Although this study demonstrates that the combined SEP/MEP technique was feasible, it is not yet possible to demonstrate benefit in improving the outcome of patients. Concerning the safety of stimulation, the exact localization of the central sulcus by the noninvasive SEP method, compared with direct electrical stimulation, offered more safety for the patient. The modified technique of direct motor cortex stimulation needed much less charge density than did the common technique. The recording of electromyographic responses instead of movements made objective documentation possible, and the analysis of amplitudes and latencies will supply quantitative information about the motor system.
在99例中央区及周围有占位性病变的患者中,术中利用体感诱发电位(SEP)相位反转定位中央沟。其中33例患者直接刺激运动皮层,并记录前臂屈肌、大鱼际肌和小鱼际肌的肌电图反应。另外25例有皮质下病变或病变直接位于锥体束的患者在手术过程中通过运动诱发电位(MEP)进行持续监测。所有患者均能准确确定中央沟和肿瘤位置;90.8%的患者获得了相位反转,另外9.2%的患者通过解剖结构以及SEP的N20或P20消失实现了定位。33例患者中有32例获得了MEP,在肿瘤切除开始时接受MEP监测的所有25例患者也都获得了MEP。从这项研究可以得出结论,尽管麻醉未按照方案进行系统控制,但SEP相位反转和改良的皮层电刺激相结合与全身麻醉是相容的。虽然这项研究表明SEP/MEP联合技术是可行的,但尚无法证明其对改善患者预后有益。关于刺激的安全性,与直接电刺激相比,通过非侵入性SEP方法准确定位中央沟对患者更安全。改良的直接运动皮层刺激技术所需的电荷密度比常规技术少得多。记录肌电图反应而非运动使得客观记录成为可能,对波幅和潜伏期的分析将提供有关运动系统的定量信息。