• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢曲松与头孢噻肟治疗儿童上尿路感染的比较。

Comparison of ceftriaxone versus cefotaxime for childhood upper urinary tract infections.

作者信息

Bakkaloglu A, Saatci U, Soylemezoglu O, Ozen S, Topaloglu R, Besbas N, Saatci I

机构信息

Pediatric Nephrology Department, Hacettepe University Children's Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Chemother. 1996 Feb;8(1):59-62. doi: 10.1179/joc.1996.8.1.59.

DOI:10.1179/joc.1996.8.1.59
PMID:8835111
Abstract

It is very important to treat patients with upper urinary tract infections (UTIs) promptly and effectively because of the potential sequelae. In the present study we compare the efficacy of the two cephalosporins, ceftriaxone and cefotaxime, in childhood pyelonephritis. The study protocal included 10 days of drug therapy. Both in patients receiving ceftriaxone and cefotaxime, successful eradication was achieved at the second day of therapy. The overall cure rate was significantly better in the ceftriaxone group than the cefotaxime group in terms of recurrence and reinfections (p < 0.05). Furthermore, in the complicated group, ceftriaxone was slightly superior to cefotaxime, approaching significance in terms of preventing recurrent infections. No serious adverse effects were observed in either of the groups. The present study has shown that ceftriaxone exhibits favorable clinical and bacteriologic efficacy in patients with complicated and uncomplicated upper UTI. Once-daily injection of ceftriaxone in children is also an attractive advantage of the drug when compared to twice-daily cefotaxime.

摘要

由于存在潜在的后遗症,及时有效地治疗上尿路感染(UTI)患者非常重要。在本研究中,我们比较了两种头孢菌素(头孢曲松和头孢噻肟)在儿童肾盂肾炎中的疗效。研究方案包括10天的药物治疗。在接受头孢曲松和头孢噻肟治疗的患者中,治疗第二天均实现了成功根除。在复发和再感染方面,头孢曲松组的总体治愈率显著优于头孢噻肟组(p < 0.05)。此外,在复杂组中,头孢曲松略优于头孢噻肟,在预防复发性感染方面接近显著差异。两组均未观察到严重不良反应。本研究表明,头孢曲松在复杂性和非复杂性上尿路感染患者中表现出良好的临床和细菌学疗效。与每日两次注射头孢噻肟相比,儿童每日一次注射头孢曲松也是该药的一个吸引人的优势。

相似文献

1
Comparison of ceftriaxone versus cefotaxime for childhood upper urinary tract infections.头孢曲松与头孢噻肟治疗儿童上尿路感染的比较。
J Chemother. 1996 Feb;8(1):59-62. doi: 10.1179/joc.1996.8.1.59.
2
[Cost-effectiveness comparative study of ceftriaxone verus cefotaxime in the treatment of complicated urinary infections].头孢曲松与头孢噻肟治疗复杂性泌尿系统感染的成本效益比较研究
Actas Urol Esp. 1997 Jul-Aug;21(7):668-74.
3
Antibiotic treatment for urinary tract infections in pediatric patients.儿科患者尿路感染的抗生素治疗。
Minerva Pediatr. 2003 Oct;55(5):395-406.
4
[Comparative study of intravenous ceftriaxone followed by oral cefixime versus ceftriaxone alone in the treatment of severe upper urinary tract infections].静脉注射头孢曲松后口服头孢克肟与单纯使用头孢曲松治疗严重上尿路感染的对比研究
Presse Med. 1989 Oct 11;18(32):1617-21.
5
Treatment of complicated urinary tract infection in adults: combined analysis of two randomized, double-blind, multicentre trials comparing ertapenem and ceftriaxone followed by appropriate oral therapy.成人复杂性尿路感染的治疗:两项随机、双盲、多中心试验的联合分析,比较厄他培南和头孢曲松随后进行适当口服治疗的效果。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Jun;53 Suppl 2:ii67-74. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh208.
6
Cefotaxime. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the treatment of infections.头孢噻肟。对其用于治疗感染的药物经济学综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Jan;13(1 Pt 1):91-106. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813010-00009.
7
Ertapenem versus ceftriaxone followed by appropriate oral therapy for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections in adults: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study.厄他培南与头孢曲松随后联合适当口服疗法治疗成人复杂性尿路感染:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲多中心研究的结果
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Sep;46(9):2895-900. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.9.2895-2900.2002.
8
[Multicentre, randomized, prospective and comparative study of ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and cefuroxime in treating mild to moderate respiratory tract infection].头孢曲松、头孢噻肟和头孢呋辛治疗轻至中度呼吸道感染的多中心、随机、前瞻性对照研究
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 1998 Sep;21(9):528-31.
9
Cefotaxime twice daily versus ceftriaxone once daily. A randomized controlled study in patients with serious infections.头孢噻肟每日两次与头孢曲松每日一次的对比:一项针对严重感染患者的随机对照研究
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(1-2):155-7. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(95)00080-t.
10
Prospective comparison of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime for the short-term treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.头孢曲松与头孢噻肟用于儿童细菌性脑膜炎短期治疗的前瞻性比较
Chemotherapy. 1998 Mar-Apr;44(2):142-7. doi: 10.1159/000007106.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotics and Cure Rates in Childhood Febrile Urinary Tract Infections in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.抗生素在临床试验中对儿童发热性尿路感染的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Drugs. 2018 Oct;78(15):1593-1604. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0988-1.
2
Antibiotics for acute pyelonephritis in children.儿童急性肾盂肾炎的抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 28;2014(7):CD003772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003772.pub4.
3
Antibiotics for treating lower urinary tract infection in children.用于治疗儿童下尿路感染的抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD006857. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006857.pub2.
4
Cefotaxime. A reappraisal of its antibacterial activity and pharmacokinetic properties, and a review of its therapeutic efficacy when administered twice daily for the treatment of mild to moderate infections.头孢噻肟。对其抗菌活性和药代动力学特性的重新评估,以及对其每日两次给药治疗轻至中度感染时的治疗效果的综述。
Drugs. 1997 Mar;53(3):483-510. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199753030-00009.