Suppr超能文献

对实习生结肠镜插入技术的前瞻性评估。

Prospective assessment of colonoscopic intubation skills in trainees.

作者信息

Chak A, Cooper G S, Blades E W, Canto M, Sivak M V

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, OH 44106, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Jul;44(1):54-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70229-8.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommends a minimum of 100 supervised colonoscopies prior to assessment of technical competence. To establish a measurable standard for competence and to assess this recommendation, performance of colonoscopies at a university hospital was studied.

METHODS

Colonoscopic preparation, surgical history, medication usage, technical maneuvers, extent of colon intubated, success rate, and cecal intubation time were prospectively monitored for first-year trainees, second-year trainees, and attendings.

RESULTS

Excluding patients with poor preparations or colonic resections, 496 colonoscopies were studied. First-year trainees (n = 5) required attending assistance in 73 of 79 (92%) procedures. Second-year trainees (n = 7), who had performed a mean of 123 colonoscopies prior to the study, required attending assistance in 37 of 102 (36.3%) procedures. Attendings (n = 7) successfully intubated the cecum in 297 of 315 (94.3%) colonoscopies in a median time of 10.5 minutes. Second-year trainees were less successful than attendings in cecal intubation (success rate = 84%, p < 0.05), and required more time (median = 14.5 minutes, p < 0.01). More technical maneuvers were performed, and a lesser extent of colon was intubated, during trainee colonoscopies.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a 90% success rate and a median cecal intubation time of less than 15 minutes as reasonable standards for measuring technical competence. Trainees do not achieve this standard after the performance of 100 supervised colonoscopies.

摘要

引言

美国胃肠内镜学会建议在评估技术能力之前,至少进行100次有监督的结肠镜检查。为了建立可衡量的能力标准并评估这一建议,我们对一家大学医院的结肠镜检查操作进行了研究。

方法

前瞻性监测一年级实习生、二年级实习生和主治医生的结肠镜检查准备情况、手术史、用药情况、技术操作、结肠插管范围、成功率和盲肠插管时间。

结果

排除准备不佳或有结肠切除术的患者后,共研究了496例结肠镜检查。一年级实习生(n = 5)在79例操作中有73例(92%)需要主治医生协助。二年级实习生(n = 7)在研究前平均已进行123例结肠镜检查,在102例操作中有37例(36.3%)需要主治医生协助。主治医生(n = 7)在315例结肠镜检查中有297例(94.3%)成功插入盲肠,中位时间为10.5分钟。二年级实习生在盲肠插管方面不如主治医生成功(成功率 = 84%,p < 0.05),且需要更多时间(中位时间 = 14.5分钟,p < 0.01)。实习生进行结肠镜检查时,进行的技术操作更多,插入的结肠范围更小。

结论

我们提出90%的成功率和小于15分钟的中位盲肠插管时间作为衡量技术能力的合理标准。实习生在进行100次有监督的结肠镜检查后未达到这一标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验