• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对实习生结肠镜插入技术的前瞻性评估。

Prospective assessment of colonoscopic intubation skills in trainees.

作者信息

Chak A, Cooper G S, Blades E W, Canto M, Sivak M V

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, OH 44106, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Jul;44(1):54-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70229-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70229-8
PMID:8836717
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommends a minimum of 100 supervised colonoscopies prior to assessment of technical competence. To establish a measurable standard for competence and to assess this recommendation, performance of colonoscopies at a university hospital was studied.

METHODS

Colonoscopic preparation, surgical history, medication usage, technical maneuvers, extent of colon intubated, success rate, and cecal intubation time were prospectively monitored for first-year trainees, second-year trainees, and attendings.

RESULTS

Excluding patients with poor preparations or colonic resections, 496 colonoscopies were studied. First-year trainees (n = 5) required attending assistance in 73 of 79 (92%) procedures. Second-year trainees (n = 7), who had performed a mean of 123 colonoscopies prior to the study, required attending assistance in 37 of 102 (36.3%) procedures. Attendings (n = 7) successfully intubated the cecum in 297 of 315 (94.3%) colonoscopies in a median time of 10.5 minutes. Second-year trainees were less successful than attendings in cecal intubation (success rate = 84%, p < 0.05), and required more time (median = 14.5 minutes, p < 0.01). More technical maneuvers were performed, and a lesser extent of colon was intubated, during trainee colonoscopies.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a 90% success rate and a median cecal intubation time of less than 15 minutes as reasonable standards for measuring technical competence. Trainees do not achieve this standard after the performance of 100 supervised colonoscopies.

摘要

引言

美国胃肠内镜学会建议在评估技术能力之前,至少进行100次有监督的结肠镜检查。为了建立可衡量的能力标准并评估这一建议,我们对一家大学医院的结肠镜检查操作进行了研究。

方法

前瞻性监测一年级实习生、二年级实习生和主治医生的结肠镜检查准备情况、手术史、用药情况、技术操作、结肠插管范围、成功率和盲肠插管时间。

结果

排除准备不佳或有结肠切除术的患者后,共研究了496例结肠镜检查。一年级实习生(n = 5)在79例操作中有73例(92%)需要主治医生协助。二年级实习生(n = 7)在研究前平均已进行123例结肠镜检查,在102例操作中有37例(36.3%)需要主治医生协助。主治医生(n = 7)在315例结肠镜检查中有297例(94.3%)成功插入盲肠,中位时间为10.5分钟。二年级实习生在盲肠插管方面不如主治医生成功(成功率 = 84%,p < 0.05),且需要更多时间(中位时间 = 14.5分钟,p < 0.01)。实习生进行结肠镜检查时,进行的技术操作更多,插入的结肠范围更小。

结论

我们提出90%的成功率和小于15分钟的中位盲肠插管时间作为衡量技术能力的合理标准。实习生在进行100次有监督的结肠镜检查后未达到这一标准。

相似文献

1
Prospective assessment of colonoscopic intubation skills in trainees.对实习生结肠镜插入技术的前瞻性评估。
Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Jul;44(1):54-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70229-8.
2
An adequate level of training for technical competence in screening and diagnostic colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter evaluation of the learning curve.筛查和诊断性结肠镜检查技术能力的充分培训水平:学习曲线的前瞻性多中心评估
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Apr;67(4):683-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.018. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
3
Quality of colonoscopy performance among gastroenterology and surgical trainees: a need for common training standards for all trainees?胃肠病学和外科培训生的结肠镜检查表现质量:是否需要为所有培训生制定共同的培训标准?
Endoscopy. 2011 Nov;43(11):935-40. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256633. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
4
[Study of the quality of colonoscopies].[结肠镜检查质量研究]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2008 Jun 16;170(25):2232-4.
5
Predictive factors affecting cecal intubation failure in colonoscopy trainees.影响结肠镜检查学员盲肠插管失败的预测因素。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Jan 19;13:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-5.
6
[How many procedures are necessary to achieve competency in colonoscopy?].[要达到结肠镜检查的熟练程度需要进行多少例操作?]
Arq Gastroenterol. 2004 Oct-Dec;41(4):211-4. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032004000400002. Epub 2005 Mar 29.
7
The cap-assisted technique enhances colonoscopy training: prospective randomized study of six trainees.帽辅助技术增强结肠镜检查培训:六名受训者的前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2939-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2288-2. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
8
Acquisition of competence in colonoscopy: the learning curve of trainees.结肠镜检查技能的获得:受训人员的学习曲线
Endoscopy. 1999 Nov;31(9):702-6. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-146.
9
Competence measurement during colonoscopy training: the use of self-assessment of performance measures.结肠镜检查培训中的能力测量:使用自我评估的绩效测量方法。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;107(7):971-5. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.481.
10
Objective evaluation of endoscopy skills during training.培训期间内镜检查技能的客观评估。
Ann Intern Med. 1993 Jan 1;118(1):40-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-1-199301010-00008.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Body Mass Index on Cecal Intubation Time During Unsedated Colonoscopy: Variation Across the Learning Stages of an Endoscopist.体重指数对无镇静结肠镜检查盲肠插管时间的影响:内镜医生学习阶段的变化。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Mar 12;30:e942661. doi: 10.12659/MSM.942661.
2
Can my surgeon scope? Trends in endoscopy training volume and experience among general surgery residents in the United States: a nationwide analysis.我的外科医生可以进行内镜检查吗?美国普通外科住院医师内镜培训量和经验的趋势:全国性分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Mar;38(3):1491-1498. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10690-5. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
3
Using computerized assessment in simulated colonoscopy: a validation study.
在模拟结肠镜检查中使用计算机化评估:一项验证研究。
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Jun;8(6):E783-E791. doi: 10.1055/a-1132-5259. Epub 2020 May 25.
4
Trainee colonoscopy quality is influenced by the independent and unobserved performance characteristics of supervising physicians.实习结肠镜检查的质量受到指导医师独立且难以观察到的操作特征的影响。
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Jan;7(1):E74-E82. doi: 10.1055/a-0770-2646. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
5
Objective assessment of colonoscope manipulation skills in colonoscopy training.结肠镜操作技能的客观评估在结肠镜检查培训中。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 Jan;13(1):105-114. doi: 10.1007/s11548-017-1676-4. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
6
Education and Training Guidelines for the Board of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.韩国胃肠内镜学会理事会教育与培训指南
Clin Endosc. 2017 Jul;50(4):345-356. doi: 10.5946/ce.2017.106. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
7
Correlation between obesity and metabolic syndrome-related factors and cecal intubation time during colonoscopy.肥胖与代谢综合征相关因素及结肠镜检查时盲肠插管时间的相关性
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 5;10:1-7. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S120544. eCollection 2017.
8
The efficacy of training insertion skill on a physical model colonoscopy simulator.在物理模型结肠镜模拟器上训练插入技能的效果。
Endosc Int Open. 2016 Dec;4(12):E1252-E1260. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-114773. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
9
Does a Pre-Training Program Influence Colonoscopy Proficiency during Fellowship?培训前计划会影响住院医师培训期间的结肠镜检查熟练程度吗?
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 20;11(10):e0164360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164360. eCollection 2016.
10
Achieving competence in colonoscopy: Milestones and the need for a new endoscopic curriculum in gastroenterology training.实现结肠镜检查技能达标:里程碑及胃肠病学培训中新型内镜课程的必要性。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Dec 10;7(18):1279-86. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i18.1279.