Suppr超能文献

失语症患者思维过程的神经心理学研究(作者译)

[Neuropsychological investigations of thought processes in aphasics (author's transl)].

作者信息

Kreindler A, Mihăilescu L, Alexandru S, Stoica V

出版信息

Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970). 1977 May 16;223(3):239-47. doi: 10.1007/BF00342341.

Abstract

Fifteen aphasics and 10 patients with cortical lesions of the right (nondominant) hemisphere were examined using 10 nonverbal psychological tests with 23 variants. The number of correct solutions and the duration of fulfillment of each variant were recorded with statistical significance and standard deviations. Aphasics as well as patients with right-sided cortical damage have lower scores than normal individuals for both correctness and duration of performance. The two groups of patients differed in that the number of correct solutions was higher in aphasics than it was in right-sided cortical injury cases. Aphasics required a longer time to perform the tests used by the authors than normals did, and those with right-sided cortical lesions required an even longer time. The results were also dependent on the kind of test applied. For example, the differences shown by tests 4, 5, 6, and 10 were comparatively less among the three groups (normals, aphasics, and right-sided damage of the cortex) and nonsignificant. The results are discussed in relation to thought processes, language, and aphasia.

摘要

使用包含23个变体的10项非言语心理测试,对15名失语症患者和10名右侧(非优势)半球皮质损伤患者进行了检查。记录每个变体的正确解答数量和完成时间,并计算其具有统计学意义的值和标准差。失语症患者以及右侧皮质损伤患者在解答正确性和完成时间方面的得分均低于正常个体。两组患者的不同之处在于,失语症患者的正确解答数量高于右侧皮质损伤患者。与正常人相比,失语症患者完成作者所使用测试的时间更长,而右侧皮质损伤患者所需时间则更长。结果还取决于所应用测试的类型。例如,测试4、5、6和10在三组(正常人、失语症患者和右侧皮质损伤患者)之间显示出的差异相对较小且无统计学意义。结合思维过程、语言和失语症对结果进行了讨论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验