Suppr超能文献

[用于临床应用的多项选择词汇智力测验的维也纳版本]

[Vienna version for clinical application of the Multiple Choice Vocabulary Intelligence Test].

作者信息

Opgenoorth E, Baldaszti E, Voracek M

机构信息

Bereich Klinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinik für Psychiatrie, Wien.

出版信息

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1996;108(3):59-68.

PMID:8839191
Abstract

A deterministic reliability analysis of the Mehrfachwahl-Wortschatz-Intelligenztest, Lehrl (MWT-A, MWT-B), a very economical device for the assessment of crystallized intelligence and the most frequently administered intelligence test by physicians in Germany, was performed on the test data of n = 300 in- and outpatients (University Clinic for Psychiatry, Vienna). Numerical outcomes showed a substantial lack of satisfying test properties, which are further also discussed under non-numerical aspects. For the clinical application of the MWT in Eastern Austria three alternative versions of the MWT (each consisting of 37 items and having better scale characteristics in the analysed sample than the original scales) were developed from the original item pool and presented as MWT-PIRIT, MWT-RIT, and MWT-PI. All five MWT scales were standardized for the present with the patient sample for clinical application. Correlational analyses with a measure for fluid intelligence (Standard Progressive Matrices) suggested only moderate associations between crystallized and fluid intelligence, as well as a differential validity for the MWT in our sample.

摘要

对德国医生最常使用的用于评估晶体智力的经济高效工具——莱赫尔多重选择词汇智能测试(MWT-A、MWT-B)进行了确定性可靠性分析,分析基于维也纳大学精神病学诊所300名门诊和住院患者的测试数据。数值结果显示该测试的属性严重缺乏令人满意之处,非数值方面也对此进行了讨论。为了在奥地利东部临床应用MWT,从原始项目库中开发了三个MWT替代版本(每个版本由37个项目组成,在分析样本中比原始量表具有更好的量表特征),分别命名为MWT-PIRIT、MWT-RIT和MWT-PI。所有五个MWT量表均针对本研究中的患者样本进行了标准化,以用于临床应用。与流体智力测量工具(标准渐进矩阵)的相关分析表明,晶体智力和流体智力之间仅有中等程度的关联,且MWT在我们的样本中具有差异效度。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验