• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在激烈冲突情境下决策过程模型的测试

Test of a model of decision processes in an intense conflict situation.

作者信息

Cole S G, Phillips J L, Hartman E A

出版信息

Behav Sci. 1977 May;22(3):186-96. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830220305.

DOI:10.1002/bs.3830220305
PMID:883943
Abstract

A particularly intense form of conflict. It is a situation in which at most one of some set of participants may obtain an objective and in which it is possible that none will obtain their objective. A mathematical model is derived from basic assumptions about the decision making process in a three-person uelative conflict situation, a truel. It is proposed that the model is generalizable to n-person situations. A preliminary test of the model that varied only one of the parameters revealed support for the model. More extensive tests of the model are warranted. In addition, the applicability of the model to internation or intergroup conflict is explored.

摘要

一种特别激烈的冲突形式。在这种情况下,某组参与者中至多只有一人能够实现目标,而且有可能没有人能实现其目标。一个数学模型是从关于三人相对冲突情形(三人决斗)中决策过程的基本假设推导出来的。有人提出该模型可推广到n人情形。对仅改变一个参数的该模型进行的初步测试为该模型提供了支持。有必要对该模型进行更广泛的测试。此外,还探讨了该模型在国际或群体间冲突中的适用性。

相似文献

1
Test of a model of decision processes in an intense conflict situation.在激烈冲突情境下决策过程模型的测试
Behav Sci. 1977 May;22(3):186-96. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830220305.
2
Intergroup conflict and rational decision making.群体间冲突与理性决策。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 2;9(12):e114013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114013. eCollection 2014.
3
Decision making under conflict: decision time as a measure of conflict strength.冲突情境下的决策:以决策时间衡量冲突强度
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):167-76. doi: 10.3758/bf03196481.
4
Tradeoffs and theory: the double-mediation model.权衡与理论:双中介模型
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 May;135(2):237-61. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.237.
5
Basic psychological needs and neurophysiological responsiveness to decisional conflict: an event-related potential study of integrative self processes.基本心理需求与决策冲突的神经生理反应:一项关于整合自我过程的事件相关电位研究
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Oct;16(5):848-65. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0436-1.
6
An application of a dual-process approach to decision making in social dilemmas.双过程方法在社会困境决策中的应用。
Am J Psychol. 2011 Summer;124(2):203-12. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.2.0203.
7
On the Dominance of Attitude Emotionality.论态度情感性的主导地位。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Feb;42(2):259-70. doi: 10.1177/0146167215623273.
8
Positive consequences of conflict on decision making: when a conflict mindset facilitates choice.冲突对决策的积极影响:当冲突思维促进选择时。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Feb;144(1):1-6. doi: 10.1037/a0038551. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
9
Judgment and decision making.判断与决策
Annu Rev Psychol. 1998;49:447-77. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.447.
10
Swarm intelligence: when uncertainty meets conflict.群体智能:当不确定性遇到冲突。
Am Nat. 2013 Nov;182(5):592-610. doi: 10.1086/673253. Epub 2013 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Truels and strategies for survival.生存之道与策略。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 20;9(1):8996. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45253-5.