• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生存之道与策略。

Truels and strategies for survival.

机构信息

School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia.

Centre for Biomedical Electrical Engineering (CBME), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 20;9(1):8996. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45253-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-45253-5
PMID:31222029
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6586887/
Abstract

The truel is a three person competition that generalises the classic duel. In this game three players try to eliminate each other in a series of one-to-one duels until there is only one survivor. The players' marksmanship, shooting order and strategies for choosing a target play a significant role in individual's survival probability. Strategies such as shooting into the air (abstention), shooting at the strongest opponent, and shooting at the weakest opponent have been analysed in the previous literature. In this paper, for the first time, we consider suicidal and random strategies that can be chosen by the weaker player. We show that although there is no possible highest probability region for weakest player adopting suicidal strategy, the player may increase the survival probability via switching between suicidal and abstention strategies randomly. In addition, we demonstrate that there is a narrow survival area for the weakest player when the player aims randomly at two other opponents, and eventually the area fades away if the player fires randomly at himself or the other two opponents.

摘要

The truel 是一种三人竞争游戏,它将经典的决斗进行了推广。在这个游戏中,三个玩家试图在一系列一对一的决斗中互相淘汰,直到只剩下一个幸存者。玩家的枪法、射击顺序和选择目标的策略在个人的生存概率中起着重要作用。在之前的文献中,已经分析了诸如朝天射击(弃权)、射击最强对手和射击最弱对手等策略。在本文中,我们首次考虑了较弱玩家可以选择的自杀和随机策略。我们表明,尽管较弱玩家采取自杀策略的最高概率区域并不存在,但玩家可以通过随机切换自杀和弃权策略来提高生存概率。此外,我们还证明了,当较弱玩家随机瞄准另外两个对手时,存在一个狭窄的生存区域,而如果玩家随机向自己或另外两个对手开火,该区域最终会消失。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed4/6586887/c35de721725c/41598_2019_45253_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed4/6586887/9d579baf47f1/41598_2019_45253_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed4/6586887/396e7c360d18/41598_2019_45253_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed4/6586887/4458448a5bff/41598_2019_45253_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed4/6586887/c35de721725c/41598_2019_45253_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed4/6586887/9d579baf47f1/41598_2019_45253_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed4/6586887/396e7c360d18/41598_2019_45253_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed4/6586887/4458448a5bff/41598_2019_45253_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed4/6586887/c35de721725c/41598_2019_45253_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Truels and strategies for survival.生存之道与策略。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 20;9(1):8996. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45253-5.
2
Survival of the weakest in N-person duels and the maintenance of variation under constant selection.在 N 人决斗中弱者的生存和持续选择下的变异维持。
Evolution. 2012 Mar;66(3):637-650. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01477.x. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
3
Effect of opponent type on moral emotions and responses to video game play.对手类型对视频游戏中道德情感和反应的影响。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011 Nov;14(11):695-8. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0523. Epub 2011 May 10.
4
Zero-Determinant Strategies in Iterated Public Goods Game.重复公共物品博弈中的零行列式策略
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 21;5:13096. doi: 10.1038/srep13096.
5
Autocratic strategies for alternating games.交替博弈的独裁策略。
Theor Popul Biol. 2017 Feb;113:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
6
Challenging the other: exploring the role of opponent gender in digital game competition for female players.挑战对方:探索对手性别在女性玩家数字游戏竞争中的作用。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 May;17(5):303-9. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2013.0331. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
7
Kinematic adjustments in the basketball jump shot against an opponent.面对对手时篮球跳投的运动学调整。
Ergonomics. 2000 Oct;43(10):1651-60. doi: 10.1080/001401300750004069.
8
Do not fear your opponent: suboptimal changes of a prevention strategy when facing stronger opponents.不要害怕你的对手:面对更强大的对手时,预防策略的次优变化。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Aug;141(3):527-38. doi: 10.1037/a0025761. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
9
Players' quality of play and overall interest of the game in dyadic competition.双人比赛中球员的比赛质量和比赛的整体趣味性。
Am J Psychol. 2008 Spring;121(1):17-33.
10
Experimental Results on the Centipede Game in Normal Form: An Investigation on Learning.正规形式蜈蚣博弈的实验结果:关于学习的一项调查
J Math Psychol. 1998 Jun;42(2/3):356-84. doi: 10.1006/jmps.1998.1225.

引用本文的文献

1
Hip osteoarthritis: A novel network analysis of subchondral trabecular bone structures.髋骨关节炎:对软骨下小梁骨结构的新型网络分析
PNAS Nexus. 2022 Nov 21;1(5):pgac258. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac258. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
The development of tumour vascular networks.肿瘤血管网络的发展。
Commun Biol. 2021 Sep 22;4(1):1111. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02632-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Ecological suicide in microbes.微生物的生态自杀。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 May;2(5):867-872. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0535-1. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
2
Sperm competition drives the evolution of suicidal reproduction in mammals.精子竞争促使哺乳动物产生自杀式繁殖的进化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 29;110(44):17910-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310691110. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
3
Survival of the weakest in N-person duels and the maintenance of variation under constant selection.在 N 人决斗中弱者的生存和持续选择下的变异维持。
Evolution. 2012 Mar;66(3):637-650. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01477.x. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
4
Rock-scissors-paper and the survival of the weakest.石头剪刀布与最弱的生存。
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jul 7;268(1474):1323-7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1670.
5
Test of a model of decision processes in an intense conflict situation.在激烈冲突情境下决策过程模型的测试
Behav Sci. 1977 May;22(3):186-96. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830220305.