• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冲突情境下的决策:以决策时间衡量冲突强度

Decision making under conflict: decision time as a measure of conflict strength.

作者信息

Diederich Adele

机构信息

School of Humanities and Social Sciences, International University Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):167-76. doi: 10.3758/bf03196481.

DOI:10.3758/bf03196481
PMID:12747504
Abstract

Conflict and choice are closely related in that choice produces conflict and conflict is resolved by making a choice. Although conflict was invoked in psychological approaches to decision making early on (Lewin, 1931/1964), no generally accepted measure of conflict strength has been established (Tversky & Shafir, 1992). The present study introduces a model (multiattribute decision field theory) that predicts a decision time pattern depending on the conflict situation. In a risky decision-making experiment with multiattribute choice alternatives, decision time is investigated as a possible measure of conflict strength. It is shown that the model can be fitted to a complex choice pattern.

摘要

冲突与选择密切相关,因为选择会产生冲突,而冲突通过做出选择来解决。尽管冲突在早期的决策心理学方法中就已被提及(勒温,1931/1964),但尚未建立普遍接受的冲突强度衡量标准(特沃斯基和沙菲尔,1992)。本研究引入了一个模型(多属性决策场理论),该模型根据冲突情况预测决策时间模式。在一个具有多属性选择方案的风险决策实验中,研究了决策时间作为冲突强度的一种可能衡量指标。结果表明,该模型可以拟合复杂的选择模式。

相似文献

1
Decision making under conflict: decision time as a measure of conflict strength.冲突情境下的决策:以决策时间衡量冲突强度
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):167-76. doi: 10.3758/bf03196481.
2
MDFT account of decision making under time pressure.时间压力下决策的多维度功能理论解释
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):157-66. doi: 10.3758/bf03196480.
3
Decision making and learning while taking sequential risks.在承担一系列风险时进行决策和学习。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jan;34(1):167-85. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.167.
4
Action dynamics reveal parallel competition in decision making.行动动力学揭示了决策过程中的并行竞争。
Psychol Sci. 2008 Jan;19(1):22-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02041.x.
5
Context effects: the proportional difference model and the reflection of preference.情境效应:比例差异模型与偏好反映
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Sep;29(5):942-54. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.942.
6
Quantum-like model of cognitive decision making and information processing.认知决策与信息处理的类量子模型。
Biosystems. 2009 Mar;95(3):179-87. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2008.10.004. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
7
Framing and conflict: aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky choice.框架与冲突:抱负水平偶然性、现状及当前风险选择理论
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Sep;18(5):1040-57. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.5.1040.
8
Tradeoffs and theory: the double-mediation model.权衡与理论:双中介模型
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 May;135(2):237-61. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.237.
9
The emergence of coherence over the course of decision making.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Sep;27(5):1250-60. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.27.5.1250.
10
A Fuzzy-Trace Theory of Risk and Time Preferences in Decision Making: Integrating Cognition and Motivation.决策中风险与时间偏好的模糊痕迹理论:整合认知与动机
Nebr Symp Motiv. 2017;64:115-144.

引用本文的文献

1
Punishment is slower than cooperation or defection in online network games.惩罚在网络游戏中的作用比合作或背叛要慢。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 3;14(1):23024. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72939-2.
2
Fear of being near: Fear supersedes sociability when interacting amid a pandemic.对靠近的恐惧:在疫情期间互动时,恐惧取代了社交性。
Pers Individ Dif. 2022 Mar;187:111404. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111404. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
3
Keep your budget together! Investigating determinants on risky decision-making about losses.保持预算一致!研究关于亏损的风险决策的决定因素。

本文引用的文献

1
Conflict and choice time.
Br J Psychol. 1957 May;48(2):106-18. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1957.tb00606.x.
2
Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making.多选项决策场理论:一种决策的动态联结主义模型。
Psychol Rev. 2001 Apr;108(2):370-92. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.2.370.
3
Determinants of the remembered utility of aversive sounds.厌恶声音记忆效用的决定因素。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000 Mar;129(1):27-42. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.129.1.27.
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 21;17(3):e0265822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265822. eCollection 2022.
4
The action dynamics of approach-avoidance conflict during decision-making.决策过程中趋近-回避冲突的动作动力学。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Jan;76(1):160-179. doi: 10.1177/17470218221087625. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
5
Social Environment Shapes the Speed of Cooperation.社会环境塑造合作的速度。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 20;6:29622. doi: 10.1038/srep29622.
6
Basic psychological needs and neurophysiological responsiveness to decisional conflict: an event-related potential study of integrative self processes.基本心理需求与决策冲突的神经生理反应:一项关于整合自我过程的事件相关电位研究
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Oct;16(5):848-65. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0436-1.
7
Motivation and affective judgments differentially recruit neurons in the primate dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex.动机和情感判断在灵长类动物的背外侧前额叶皮层和前扣带皮层中分别募集不同的神经元。
J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 4;35(5):1939-53. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1731-14.2015.
8
Sequential sampling model for multiattribute choice alternatives with random attention time and processing order.具有随机注意时间和处理顺序的多属性选择替代方案的顺序抽样模型。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Sep 9;8:697. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00697. eCollection 2014.
9
Individual differences in the balance of GABA to glutamate in pFC predict the ability to select among competing options.前额叶皮质中γ-氨基丁酸与谷氨酸平衡的个体差异预示着在相互竞争的选项中进行选择的能力。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Nov;26(11):2490-502. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00655. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
10
All competition is not alike: neural mechanisms for resolving underdetermined and prepotent competition.并非所有竞争都是相同的:解决欠定和优势竞争的神经机制。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Nov;26(11):2608-23. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00652. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
4
Dynamic Stochastic Models for Decision Making under Time Constraints.时间限制下决策的动态随机模型
J Math Psychol. 1997 Sep;41(3):260-74. doi: 10.1006/jmps.1997.1167.
5
Choice processing in emotionally difficult decisions.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 Mar;23(2):384-405. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.23.2.384.
6
Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.决策场理论:一种在不确定环境中进行决策的动态认知方法。
Psychol Rev. 1993 Jul;100(3):432-59. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.432.
7
Decision making under uncertainty: a comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models.不确定性下的决策:简单可扩展性模型、固定样本模型和序贯抽样模型的比较
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1985 Jul;11(3):538-64. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.11.3.538.