Bromley M, Rew D, Becciolini A, Balzi M, Chadwick C, Hewitt D, Li Y Q, Potten C S
CRC Department of Histology, Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Christie Hospital (NHS) Trust, Manchester, UK.
Eur J Histochem. 1996;40(2):89-100.
Samples of microscopically normal human sigmoid colon fixed in 70% ethanol from 15 patients who had received bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) prior to surgery have been reanalyzed using a combination of proliferation markers. The specimens have been immunostained for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and after microwave treatment, they have been stained for BrdUrd and Ki-67. The 15 patients selected comprised 5 patients whose mucosa previously gave high BrdUrd labelling indices in the crypt, 5 that gave median values for BrdUrd labelling and 5 that gave low values for bromodeoxyuridine labelling on a previous analysis using tissue fixed in 70% ethanol and formal saline and using a different antibody (Potten et al., 1992). The relative levels of labelling at each cell position in the crypts has been compared using the 3 proliferation markers with the data being compared with the BrdUrd labelling as a standard labelling for S phase cells. One objective was to see whether all three proliferation markers discriminated equally well between the three groups of patient samples. The data show that the distinction between high, medium and low values seen with BrdUrd labelling was retained when Ki-67 immunostaining was analysed. PCNA immunostaining resulted in high levels of labelling and the different levels of labelling seen with BrdUrd and Ki-67 were largely lost.
对15例术前接受过溴脱氧尿苷(BrdUrd)治疗的患者,用70%乙醇固定的镜下正常的人乙状结肠样本,采用多种增殖标志物进行了重新分析。对标本进行增殖细胞核抗原(PCNA)免疫染色,微波处理后,再进行BrdUrd和Ki-67染色。所选的15例患者中,5例患者的黏膜在隐窝中先前的BrdUrd标记指数较高,5例患者的BrdUrd标记指数为中位数,5例患者在先前使用70%乙醇和甲醛固定组织并使用不同抗体的分析中,溴脱氧尿苷标记值较低(Potten等人,1992年)。使用这三种增殖标志物比较了隐窝中每个细胞位置的相对标记水平,并将数据与作为S期细胞标准标记的BrdUrd标记进行比较。一个目的是观察这三种增殖标志物在三组患者样本之间的区分效果是否同样良好。数据显示,分析Ki-67免疫染色时,BrdUrd标记所见的高、中、低值之间的区分得以保留。PCNA免疫染色导致标记水平较高,而BrdUrd和Ki-67所见的不同标记水平在很大程度上消失了。