Bleiker E M, van der Ploeg H M, Hendriks J H, Adèr H J
Department of Medical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 Oct 16;88(20):1478-82. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.20.1478.
It has been estimated that approximately 25% of all breast cancers in women can be explained by currently recognized somatic (i.e., hereditary and physiologic) risk factors. It has also been hypothesized that psychological factors may play a role in the development of breast cancer.
We investigated the extent to which personality factors, in addition to somatic risk factors, may be associated with the development of primary breast cancer.
We employed a prospective, longitudinal study design. From 1989 through 1990, a personality questionnaire was sent to all female residents of the Dutch city of Nijmegen who were 43 years of age or older. This questionnaire was sent as part of an invitation to participate in a population-based breast cancer screening program. Women who developed breast cancer among those who returned completed questionnaires were compared with women without such a diagnosis in regard to somatic risk factors and personality traits, including anxiety, anger, depression, rationality, anti-emotionality (i.e., an absence of emotional behavior or a lack of trust in one's own feelings), understanding, optimism, social support, and the expression and control of emotions. Conditional logistic regression analysis was used to identify variables that could best explain group membership (i.e., belonging to the case [breast cancer] or the control [without disease] group).
Personality questionnaires were sent to 28 940 women, and 9705 (34%) were returned in such a way that they could be used for statistical analyses. Among the 9705 women who returned useable questionnaires, 131 were diagnosed with breast cancer during the period from 1989 through 1994. Seven hundred seventy-one age-matched control subjects (up to six per case patient) were selected for the analyses. Three variables were found to be statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of breast cancer: 1) having a first-degree family member with breast cancer (versus not having an affected first-degree relative, odds ratio [OR] = 4.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.76-9.31); 2) nulliparity (i.e., having no children) (versus having had a child before the age of 30 years, OR = 2.67; 95% CI = 1.26-5.68); and 3) a relatively high score on the personality scale of anti-emotionality (versus a low score, OR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.05-1.35).
With the exception of a weak association between a high score on the anti-emotionality scale and the development of breast cancer, no support was found for the hypothesis that personality traits can differentiate between groups of women with and without breast cancer. We recommend that this study be continued and that other studies be encouraged to explore possible relationships between personality factors and the risk of breast cancer.
据估计,女性所有乳腺癌病例中约25%可由目前公认的体细胞(即遗传和生理)风险因素解释。也有人提出心理因素可能在乳腺癌的发生中起作用。
我们研究了除体细胞风险因素外,人格因素与原发性乳腺癌发生之间的关联程度。
我们采用了前瞻性纵向研究设计。1989年至1990年期间,向荷兰奈梅亨市所有43岁及以上的女性居民发送了一份人格问卷。这份问卷是作为参与一项基于人群的乳腺癌筛查项目邀请的一部分发送的。在返回完整问卷的女性中,将患乳腺癌的女性与未被诊断为此病的女性在体细胞风险因素和人格特质方面进行比较,这些人格特质包括焦虑、愤怒、抑郁、理性、反情绪化(即缺乏情感行为或对自身感受缺乏信任)、理解、乐观、社会支持以及情绪的表达和控制。采用条件逻辑回归分析来确定最能解释分组(即属于病例组[乳腺癌]或对照组[无疾病])的变量。
向28940名女性发送了人格问卷,其中9705份(34%)以可用于统计分析的方式返回。在9705名返回可用问卷的女性中,1989年至1994年期间有131人被诊断患有乳腺癌。为分析挑选了771名年龄匹配的对照对象(每名病例患者最多6名)。发现有三个变量与乳腺癌风险增加在统计学上显著相关:1)有一位患乳腺癌 的一级亲属(与没有受影响的一级亲属相比,优势比[OR]=4.05;95%置信区间[CI]=1.76 - 9.31);2)未生育(即没有孩子)(与30岁前生育过相比,OR = 2.67;95% CI = 1.26 - 5.68);3)反情绪化人格量表得分相对较高(与低分相比,OR = 1.19;95% CI = 1.05 - 1.35)。
除了反情绪化量表高分与乳腺癌发生之间存在微弱关联外,未发现人格特质能够区分患乳腺癌和未患乳腺癌女性群体这一假设的支持证据。我们建议继续开展这项研究,并鼓励其他研究探索人格因素与乳腺癌风险之间可能的关系。