Krnjević K, Puil E, Werman R
Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1977 Jun;55(3):658-69. doi: 10.1139/y77-090.
Applied microiontophoretically in the spinal cord of cats, glycine is consistently more powerful than gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in raising the membrane conductance of lumbosacral motoneurons (mean ratio of equipotent iontophoretic currents tested on same cells is 5.6:1). This is the reverse of the situation in cerebral cortex. The effect of glycine is well maintained during applications lasting about 1 min, but that of GABA, after an early peak, drops to a much lower plateau (mean plateau-over-peak ratio is 0.23). The reversal potentials for the action of GABA and glycine are initially similar but they behave differently during a prolonged application; that for glycine usually remains constant or becomes more negative whereas that for GABA tends to shift in the positive direction. Various explanations of these phenomena are considered. It is suggested that a single process, electrogenic uptake of GABA, may account for both desensitization (by removing GABA from its site of action) and the positive shift in GABA reversal potential (became uptake is probably associated with an influx of Na+).
在猫的脊髓中采用微量离子透入法施加药物时,在提高腰骶部运动神经元的膜电导方面,甘氨酸始终比γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)更有效(在同一细胞上测试的等效离子透入电流的平均比值为5.6:1)。这与大脑皮层中的情况相反。在持续约1分钟的施加过程中,甘氨酸的作用能很好地维持,但GABA的作用在早期峰值后会降至低得多的平稳水平(平均平稳水平与峰值的比值为0.23)。GABA和甘氨酸作用的反转电位最初相似,但在长时间施加过程中它们的表现不同;甘氨酸的反转电位通常保持不变或变得更负,而GABA的反转电位则倾向于向正向移动。文中考虑了对这些现象的各种解释。有人提出,一个单一的过程,即GABA的电生性摄取,可能既导致脱敏(通过将GABA从其作用位点移除),又导致GABA反转电位的正向移动(因为摄取可能与Na+内流有关)。