Pena M M, Donaghue K C, Fung A T, Bonney M, Schwingshandl J, Howard N J, Silink M
Ray Williams Institute of Paediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, Camperdown, Australia.
Diabet Med. 1995 Oct;12(10):868-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb00388.x.
The study aimed to compare the longitudinal assessment of automatic nerve function by computerized infrared pupillometry and standard cardiovascular tests in adolescents with diabetes. Adolescents (n = 150) were assessed at two time points (T1 and T2). The median time interval between assessments was 1.5 (range 0.9-3) years. At T1 the median age was 14.5 (range 8.3-19.5) years and the median duration was 6.5 (range 1.1-16) years. The pupillary variables assessed included the resting pupil diameter, the maximum constriction velocity, and the reflex amplitude of constriction. Heart rate reflexes were assessed in response to deep breathing, the Valsalva manoeuvre, and on standing from a lying position (30/15 ratio). Between visits there was a significant decrease in maximum constriction velocity (6.0 mm s-1 vs 6.3 mm s-1, p = 0.0001) and resting pupil diameter (6.2 mm vs 6.3 mm, p = 0.001). At reassessment pupillary abnormalities increased from 32 (21%) to 45 (30%), with 17 (54%) of the initial abnormalities persisting. Adolescents with abnormally slow maximum constriction velocity compared to those with normal maximum constriction velocity had a higher glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c%) at T2 (p = 0.02) and between assessments (p = 0.01). Cardiovascular test abnormalities did not increase between visits and the persistence of initial abnormalities was low (21%). In summary, pupillometry appears a more sensitive test of automatic nerve dysfunction in adolescents with diabetes than assessment of cardiovascular reflexes.
该研究旨在比较计算机化红外瞳孔测量法和标准心血管测试对糖尿病青少年自主神经功能的纵向评估。对150名青少年在两个时间点(T1和T2)进行了评估。两次评估之间的中位时间间隔为1.5年(范围0.9 - 3年)。在T1时,中位年龄为14.5岁(范围8.3 - 19.5岁),中位病程为6.5年(范围1.1 - 16年)。评估的瞳孔变量包括静息瞳孔直径、最大收缩速度和收缩反射幅度。评估了深呼吸、瓦尔萨尔瓦动作以及从卧位站立(30/15比率)时的心率反射。两次就诊之间,最大收缩速度显著降低(6.0毫米/秒对6.3毫米/秒,p = 0.0001),静息瞳孔直径也显著降低(6.2毫米对6.3毫米,p = 0.001)。重新评估时,瞳孔异常从32例(21%)增加到45例(30%),初始异常中有17例(54%)持续存在。与最大收缩速度正常的青少年相比,最大收缩速度异常缓慢的青少年在T2时糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c%)更高(p = 0.02),且两次评估之间也更高(p = 0.01)。心血管测试异常在两次就诊之间没有增加,初始异常的持续率较低(21%)。总之,对于糖尿病青少年,瞳孔测量法似乎是比心血管反射评估更敏感的自主神经功能障碍检测方法。