Bista Karki Samyukta, Coppell Kirsten J, Mitchell Logan V, Ogbuehi Kelechi C
Drishti Eye Care Center, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal.
Department of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov 17;14:3923-3930. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S279872. eCollection 2020.
Autonomic dysfunction may precede the microvascular changes that characterise diabetic retinopathy. The aim of this pilot study was to measure and compare pupillometry indices in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients - with and without diabetic retinopathy - and in healthy, age-matched controls.
Two hundred and eleven participants with T2DM aged 45-80 years were recruited from Dunedin Hospital Eye Department, Dunedin, New Zealand. They were categorised into three groups - no, mild/moderate, or severe diabetic retinopathy. Seventy age-matched, diabetes screen negative control participants were recruited from the Dunedin city community. Dynamic pupillometry was performed using an infrared pupillometer. The main outcome measures were maximum constriction velocity, average constriction velocity, absolute constriction amplitude, relative reflex amplitude, average dilation velocity and 75% re-dilation (recovery) time. Outcome measures were compared between study groups using the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test (with Dunn's multiple comparison post-test).
Pupillary parasympathetic function differed between groups. Maximum constriction velocity (p <0.001) and average constriction velocity (p <0.001) were slower, and absolute constriction amplitude (p <0.001) and relative reflex amplitude (p <0.05) were lower in the three diabetes groups compared with controls. There were no significant differences in pupillary sympathetic function between the four groups for re-dilation time, but the diabetes groups had significantly slower average dilation velocity times.
Pupillary light reflex is significantly impaired with diabetic retinal neuropathy, before clinically observable signs of diabetic retinopathy. Dynamic pupillometry may be a cheap, clinically relevant test, but sensitivity and specificity need to be determined before utilising as a screening tool for diabetic retinopathy.
自主神经功能障碍可能先于糖尿病视网膜病变特征性的微血管变化出现。本初步研究的目的是测量和比较2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者(有或无糖尿病视网膜病变)以及年龄匹配的健康对照者的瞳孔测量指标。
从新西兰达尼丁市达尼丁医院眼科招募了211名年龄在45 - 80岁的T2DM患者。他们被分为三组——无糖尿病视网膜病变组、轻度/中度糖尿病视网膜病变组或重度糖尿病视网膜病变组。从达尼丁市社区招募了70名年龄匹配、糖尿病筛查阴性的对照参与者。使用红外瞳孔计进行动态瞳孔测量。主要观察指标为最大收缩速度、平均收缩速度、绝对收缩幅度、相对反射幅度、平均扩张速度和75%再扩张(恢复)时间。使用Kruskal - Wallis非参数检验(以及Dunn多重比较事后检验)对研究组之间的观察指标进行比较。
各组之间瞳孔副交感神经功能存在差异。与对照组相比,三个糖尿病组的最大收缩速度(p <0.001)和平均收缩速度(p <0.001)较慢,绝对收缩幅度(p <0.001)和相对反射幅度(p <0.05)较低。四组之间在再扩张时间方面瞳孔交感神经功能无显著差异,但糖尿病组的平均扩张速度明显较慢。
在糖尿病视网膜病变出现临床可观察到的体征之前,糖尿病性视网膜神经病变会显著损害瞳孔对光反射。动态瞳孔测量可能是一种廉价的、与临床相关的检测方法,但在用作糖尿病视网膜病变的筛查工具之前,需要确定其敏感性和特异性。