Suppr超能文献

基于临床与基于保险的药物滥用治疗水平建议。

Clinical-based vs insurance-based recommendations for substance abuse treatment level.

作者信息

Gondolf E, Coleman K, Roman S

机构信息

Mid-Atlantic Addiction Training Institute, Indiana University of Pennsylvania 15705, USA.

出版信息

Subst Use Misuse. 1996 Jul;31(9):1101-16. doi: 10.3109/10826089609063967.

Abstract

An exploratory study of 250 patients was conducted at three treatment facilities in Western Pennsylvania, USA, to determine: 1) the extent of disagreement between clinical-based [using American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) criteria] and insurance-based [using Managed Care Organization (MCO) criteria] recommendations for treatment levels, and 2) the extend of ASAM recommendations that become the actual treatment. Cross-tabulations showed: 1) ASAM and MCO recommendations were the same for 85% of the cases, and 2) ASAM recommendations became the actual treatment in 93% of the cases. The exceptionally high level of ASAM-MCO agreement suggests a convergence in ASAM and MCO criteria and a deference to ASAM criteria in practice.

摘要

在美国宾夕法尼亚州西部的三个治疗机构对250名患者进行了一项探索性研究,以确定:1)基于临床[使用美国成瘾医学协会(ASAM)标准]和基于保险[使用管理式医疗组织(MCO)标准]的治疗水平建议之间的分歧程度,以及2)成为实际治疗的ASAM建议的范围。交叉表显示:1)85%的病例中ASAM和MCO建议相同,2)93%的病例中ASAM建议成为实际治疗。ASAM与MCO的高度一致性表明ASAM和MCO标准趋于一致,且在实践中遵循ASAM标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验