Bennett C L, Pei G K, Ultmann J E
Department of Health Services Research, Lakeside Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.
West J Med. 1996 Jul-Aug;165(1-2):37-42.
Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore, and Malaysia are initiating health care reform to meet the changing demands of populations with improved socioeconomic status and access to modern technologies and who are living longer than in previous generations. Hong Kong, in particular, is facing a unique set of circumstances as its people prepare for the transition in 1997 from a British colony to a Special Administrative Region of China. While spending only 4% of its gross domestic product on health care, it has a large and regulated public hospital system for most inpatient medical care and a separate, loosely regulated private health care system for most outpatient medical care. In 1993 the Secretary for Health and Welfare of Hong Kong initiated a year-long process to debate the pros and cons of 5 fundamental programs for health care reform. After a year of open consultation, options were chosen. We describe the Hong Kong health care system, the fundamental changes that have been adopted, and lessons for reformers in the United States.
香港、台湾、新加坡和马来西亚正在启动医疗改革,以满足社会经济地位提高、能够接触现代技术且比上一代人寿命更长的人群不断变化的需求。特别是香港,由于其民众正为1997年从英国殖民地向中国特别行政区的过渡做准备,面临着一系列独特的情况。尽管香港在医疗保健方面的支出仅占其国内生产总值的4%,但它拥有一个庞大且受监管的公立医院系统,负责大多数住院医疗服务,还有一个独立的、监管较宽松的私立医疗保健系统,负责大多数门诊医疗服务。1993年,香港卫生福利司发起了为期一年的进程,对医疗改革的5项基本方案的利弊进行辩论。经过一年的公开咨询后,做出了选择。我们描述了香港的医疗保健系统、已采用的根本性变革以及对美国改革者的经验教训。