Suppr超能文献

脐带血中IgA抗肌内膜抗体用于诊断乳糜泻。敏感性、特异性及与传统试剂盒的比较评估。

IgA antiendomysial antibodies on the umbilical cord in diagnosing celiac disease. Sensitivity, specificity, and comparative evaluation with the traditional kit.

作者信息

Carroccio A, Cavataio F, Iacono G, Agate V, Ippolito S, Kazmierska I, Campagna P, Soresi M, Montalto G

机构信息

Dept. of Internal Medicine, University of Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 1996 Aug;31(8):759-63. doi: 10.3109/00365529609010348.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The possibility of assaying antiendomysial antibodies (EmA) on the human umbilical cord instead of monkey esophagus has recently been suggested. We therefore evaluated in patients with celiac disease (CD) the sensitivity and specificity of EmA and of antigliadin antibodies (AGA) for both umbilical cord and monkey esophagus.

METHODS

We studied 36 patients with CD and atrophy of the intestinal mucosa (median age, 1.4 years), 14 patients with CD on gluten-free diet for 8-12 months (median age, 3.0 years), 36 controls without gastrointestinal disease (median age, 4.0 years), and 72 patients with cow's milk protein enteropathy (CMPE) (median age, 1.2 years). AGA and EmA on monkey esophagus were assayed with commercially available kits; the slides with umbilical cord were prepared in our laboratory.

RESULTS

There was a perfect concordance between EmA results evaluated on umbilical cord and those on monkey esophagus; there was a doubtful result in only one case on human umbilical cord, which was positive with low titer on monkey esophagus. EmA specificity was 100%; the specificity of AGA IgG varied between 72% and 94% and of AGA IgA between 90% and 100% depending on whether controls without gastrointestinal disorders or patients with CMPE were considered. EmA sensitivity was 97%, AGA IgG was 89%, and AGA IgA 72% sensitive. The only false negative for EmA was positive for AGA IgG and AGA IgA.

CONCLUSIONS

Using human umbilical cord as a substrate for EmA may provide the same sensitivity and specificity as offered by the test using monkey esophagus substrate, thus reducing costs and avoiding the use of endangered species.

摘要

背景

最近有人提出可以用人脐带而非猴食管来检测抗肌内膜抗体(EmA)。因此,我们评估了在乳糜泻(CD)患者中,EmA和抗麦胶蛋白抗体(AGA)检测人脐带和猴食管的敏感性和特异性。

方法

我们研究了36例患有CD且肠黏膜萎缩的患者(中位年龄1.4岁)、14例接受无麸质饮食8 - 12个月的CD患者(中位年龄3.0岁)、36例无胃肠道疾病的对照者(中位年龄4.0岁)以及72例牛奶蛋白肠病(CMPE)患者(中位年龄1.2岁)。使用市售试剂盒检测猴食管上的AGA和EmA;人脐带玻片在我们实验室制备。

结果

人脐带和猴食管上EmA检测结果完全一致;人脐带上仅1例结果存疑,该例在猴食管上呈低滴度阳性。EmA特异性为100%;AGA IgG的特异性在72%至94%之间,AGA IgA的特异性在90%至100%之间,具体取决于所考虑的是无胃肠道疾病的对照者还是CMPE患者。EmA敏感性为97%,AGA IgG为89%,AGA IgA为72%。EmA唯一的假阴性结果对AGA IgG和AGA IgA呈阳性。

结论

用人脐带作为EmA检测的底物,其敏感性和特异性可能与使用猴食管底物的检测相同,从而降低成本并避免使用濒危物种。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验