Arnold A C, Hepler R S, Lieber M, Alexander J M
UCLA Optic Neuropathy Center, Jules Stein Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology 90095-7005, USA.
Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Oct;122(4):535-41. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72114-2.
To evaluate the effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in reducing optic nerve damage in acute nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy.
Twenty-two eyes in 20 patients with acute nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy were treated with hyperbaric oxygen (100% oxygen, 2.0 absolute atmospheres of pressure) in two 90-minute inhalation sessions per day for ten days. Changes in mean visual acuity and mean sensitivity loss were compared with those of 27 untreated control patients with acute nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, and proportions of patients with a change in acuity or mean sensitivity loss were compared with controls. Similar analysis was performed on subgroups based on time delay from symptom onset to therapy.
Mean values for visual acuity were increased at final examination in both groups; although the increase was greater in controls, the difference was not statistically significant. Mean visual field sensitivity loss was minimally increased; although the increase was smaller in controls, the difference between groups was not significant. There was no significant difference between groups in proportions of patients with change in acuity score or mean sensitivity loss. Stratification by time delay to therapy did not suggest that treatment within nine days produced better visual results than that for either controls or those treated later.
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy using 100% oxygen and 2.0 absolute atmospheres of pressure did not produce a significant improvement in visual acuity or visual field for patients with acute nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy.
评估高压氧疗法在减轻急性非动脉炎性前部缺血性视神经病变中视神经损伤的有效性。
20例急性非动脉炎性前部缺血性视神经病变患者的22只眼接受高压氧治疗(100%氧气,绝对压力2.0个大气压),每天分两个90分钟的吸入疗程,共治疗十天。将平均视力和平均敏感度损失的变化与27例未接受治疗的急性非动脉炎性前部缺血性视神经病变对照患者进行比较,并将视力或平均敏感度损失有变化的患者比例与对照组进行比较。基于从症状发作到治疗的时间延迟,对亚组进行了类似分析。
两组在最终检查时视力平均值均有所提高;尽管对照组的提高幅度更大,但差异无统计学意义。平均视野敏感度损失略有增加;尽管对照组的增加幅度较小,但两组之间的差异不显著。视力评分或平均敏感度损失有变化的患者比例在两组之间无显著差异。按治疗时间延迟分层并未表明在九天内进行治疗比对照组或后期治疗产生更好的视力结果。
对于急性非动脉炎性前部缺血性视神经病变患者,使用100%氧气和绝对压力2.0个大气压的高压氧疗法在视力或视野方面未产生显著改善。