• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Consent to clinical research--adequately voluntary or substantially influenced?临床研究的同意——是充分自愿还是受到实质性影响?
J Med Ethics. 1996 Aug;22(4):232-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.4.232.
2
How to resolve an ethical dilemma concerning randomized clinical trials.如何解决关于随机临床试验的伦理困境。
N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 26;341(9):691-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908263410912.
3
Improving informed consent in clinical trials: a duty to experiment.提高临床试验中的知情同意:实验的责任。
Control Clin Trials. 1999 Apr;20(2):187-93. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(98)00064-6.
4
Individual autonomy and the double-blind controlled experiment: the case of desperate volunteers.
J Med Philos. 1995 Feb;20(1):43-55. doi: 10.1093/jmp/20.1.43.
5
The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals.从患者、公众和医疗保健专业人员角度看随机对照试验的伦理问题
BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1209-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1209.
6
Suspended judgment. Clinical trials of informed consent.暂缓判断。知情同意的临床试验。
Control Clin Trials. 1992 Oct;13(5):321-4. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(92)90034-w.
7
The Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg Trial. A reappraisal.《纽伦堡法典》与纽伦堡审判。重新评估。
JAMA. 1996 Nov 27;276(20):1662-6.
8
Recruitment for clinical trials: the need for public-professional co-operation.临床试验的招募:公共部门与专业人士合作的必要性。
J Med Ethics. 1994 Mar;20(1):3-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.1.3.
9
Ethics of informed consent.知情同意的伦理问题。
Can Med Assoc J. 1983 Nov 15;129(10):1069-70.
10
Personal view:个人观点:
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Mar 30;290(6473):1001. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6473.1001.

引用本文的文献

1
Vulnerability in research ethics: A call for assessing vulnerability and implementing protections.研究伦理中的脆弱性:评估脆弱性和实施保护的呼吁。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Aug 20;121(34):e2322821121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2322821121. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
2
Towards ethical good practice in cash transfer trials and their evaluation.现金转移试验及其评估中的道德良好实践
Open Res Eur. 2022 Mar 21;2:12. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14258.2. eCollection 2022.
3
Hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19: critiquing the impact of disease public profile on policy and clinical decision-making.羟氯喹与2019冠状病毒病:审视疾病公众形象对政策及临床决策的影响
J Med Ethics. 2020 Sep;46(9):574-578. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106306. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
4
A Qualitative Study into Dependent Relationships and Voluntary Informed Consent for Research in Pediatric Oncology.一项关于儿童肿瘤学研究中依赖关系与自愿知情同意的定性研究。
Paediatr Drugs. 2016 Apr;18(2):145-56. doi: 10.1007/s40272-015-0158-9.
5
Strengths and weaknesses of guideline approaches to safeguard voluntary informed consent of patients within a dependent relationship.指导方针方法在保护处于依赖关系中的患者自愿知情同意方面的优势和劣势。
BMC Med. 2014 Mar 24;12:52. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-52.
6
What potential research participants want to know about research: a systematic review.潜在研究参与者想了解的关于研究的内容:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2012 May 30;2(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000509. Print 2012.
7
Factors related to voluntary parental decision-making in pediatric oncology.儿科肿瘤学中与父母自愿决策相关的因素。
Pediatrics. 2012 May;129(5):903-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3056. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
8
Desperation May Affect Autonomy but Not Informed Consent.绝望可能影响自主性,但不影响知情同意。
AJOB Neurosci. 2011 Jan 18;2(1):45-46. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2011.559915. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
9
Consent for neonatal research.新生儿研究的同意书。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006 Sep;91(5):F374-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.075036.
10
The battering of informed consent.对知情同意的冲击
J Med Ethics. 2004 Dec;30(6):565-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.002949.

本文引用的文献

1
Of mice but not men. Problems of the randomized clinical trial.只适用于小鼠而非人类。随机临床试验的问题。
N Engl J Med. 1991 May 30;324(22):1585-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199105303242208.
2
Visceral viewpoints. Constraint and consent - on being a patient and a subject.
N Engl J Med. 1975 Nov 27;293(22):1134-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197511272932208.

临床研究的同意——是充分自愿还是受到实质性影响?

Consent to clinical research--adequately voluntary or substantially influenced?

作者信息

Hewlett S

机构信息

University of Bristol.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1996 Aug;22(4):232-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.4.232.

DOI:10.1136/jme.22.4.232
PMID:8863149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1377003/
Abstract

In clinical research the giving of consent by the patient often lies within the context of illness or the doctor/patient relationship. On exploration of these issues it would appear unlikely that the patient's consent is free of substantial influences, some of which may be strong enough to be controlling. Five categories of consent are suggested: voluntary, involuntary, coerced, enforced and partially voluntary. It is argued that consent in clinical research is substantially influenced and thus only partially voluntary. Several practical strategies are proposed to ensure adequately voluntary consent by reducing some circumstantial influences when consent to clinical research is obtained.

摘要

在临床研究中,患者给予同意往往处于患病背景或医患关系之中。对这些问题进行探究后发现,患者的同意似乎不太可能不受实质性影响,其中一些影响可能强大到足以起到控制作用。文中提出了五类同意:自愿、非自愿、被迫、强制和部分自愿。有人认为,临床研究中的同意受到了实质性影响,因此只是部分自愿。文中还提出了几种切实可行的策略,以便在获取临床研究同意时,通过减少一些环境因素的影响来确保充分的自愿同意。