• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Usefulness of brachial artery pressure with forearm compression as arterial pressure monitoring after cardiopulmonary bypass].

作者信息

Katsuno M

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Otaru Municipal Second Hospital.

出版信息

Masui. 1996 Jan;45(1):77-81.

PMID:8865729
Abstract

The pressures in the radial and brachial artery in the same extremity were measured before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP) in 18 patients. Brachial pressures were measured in two different ways, with and without forearm compression. The forearm compression was achieved by a swelled blood pressure cuff. There were no significant differences in these pressures before CBP. But the brachial pressures with the forearm compression were the highest among three kinds of pressures after CBP and there were significant differences between them. The aortic pressures during weaning from CBP were measured and compared with these pressures in 4 patients. The brachial pressures with the forearm compression were closest to aortic pressures. Therefore brachial pressure with forearm compression was recommended as a good pressure monitor when CPB was about to be finished. The patients were them divided into two groups. The patient is in the first group had less than 10 mmHg pressure difference between brachial pressure and radial pressure just after CPB. The patients in the second group had higher pressure in brachial than those in radial for over 10 mmHg just after CPB. There were no significant differences in duration in CPB, lowest rectal temperature, hematocrit and doses of catecholamines between the two groups.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Usefulness of brachial artery pressure with forearm compression as arterial pressure monitoring after cardiopulmonary bypass].
Masui. 1996 Jan;45(1):77-81.
2
Femoral artery pressures are more reliable than radial artery pressures on initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass.在体外循环开始时,股动脉压力比桡动脉压力更可靠。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2000 Jun;14(3):274-6.
3
[Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements].[无液血压计测量的肱动脉血压与中心主动脉压的比较:影响测量的因素]
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2008 Jun;36(4):239-46.
4
[Effect of vasodilators on femoral-to-radial arterial pressure gradient after cardiopulmonary bypass].[血管扩张剂对体外循环后股动脉至桡动脉压力梯度的影响]
Masui. 1999 Jun;48(6):599-604.
5
A comparison of radial, brachial, and aortic pressures after cardiopulmonary bypass.体外循环后桡动脉、肱动脉和主动脉压力的比较。
J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1989 Feb;3(1):20-6. doi: 10.1016/0888-6296(89)90006-9.
6
The noninvasive estimation of central aortic blood pressure in patients with aortic stenosis.主动脉瓣狭窄患者中心主动脉血压的无创估计
J Hypertens. 2008 Dec;26(12):2381-8. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328313919f.
7
Comparison of aortic and brachial cuff pressures in flat supine and lateral recumbent positions.平卧位和侧卧位时主动脉袖带压力与肱动脉袖带压力的比较。
Heart Lung. 1981 Sep-Oct;10(5):821-6.
8
Transmission of calibration errors (input) by generalized transfer functions to the aortic pressures (output) at different hemodynamic states.校准误差(输入)通过广义传递函数在不同血流动力学状态下传递至主动脉压力(输出)。
Int J Cardiol. 2006 Jun 7;110(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.07.014. Epub 2005 Oct 17.
9
[Femoral to radial artery pressure gradient in the patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft under normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass].[常温体外循环下冠状动脉搭桥术患者股动脉至桡动脉的压力梯度]
Masui. 1997 Sep;46(9):1235-41.
10
Comparison of axillary artery or brachial artery pressure with aortic pressure after cardiopulmonary bypass using a long radial artery catheter.使用长桡动脉导管在体外循环后比较腋动脉或肱动脉压力与主动脉压力。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1993 Jun;7(3):312-5. doi: 10.1016/1053-0770(93)90011-9.