Newton K M
Heart Lung. 1981 Sep-Oct;10(5):821-6.
Systolic, diastolic, and mean aortic pressures and bilateral systolic and diastolic brachial pressures were measured in supine and right and left lateral recumbent positions. There were no significant differences between aortic pressures recorded in supine and lateral positions. Brachial pressures measured in lateral positions (up arm, down arm) were corrected for hydrostatic effects. Uncorrected up-arm pressures demonstrated a mean drop of 13 to 14 mm Hg in systolic pressure and 14 to 17 mm Hg in diastolic pressure below corresponding supine pressures. Corrected up-arm pressures were within 3 mm Hg of their respective supine pressures. Hydrostatic effects are the most likely cause of the drop in up-arm pressures. Down-arm pressure findings were inconsistent. Influences including hydrostatic effects and flow changes resulting from compression of the brachial artery by the weight of the person's body on the arm may account for this inconsistency. Brachial pressures, when possible, should be taken in supine or sitting positions. When pressures are taken with the patient in the lateral recumbent position, the up arm should be used. Up-arm pressures will be predictably lower than respective supine pressures, whereas down-arm pressures are inconsistent.
在仰卧位以及右侧和左侧卧位测量收缩压、舒张压和平均主动脉压以及双侧肱动脉收缩压和舒张压。仰卧位和侧卧位记录的主动脉压之间无显著差异。对侧卧位(上臂、下臂)测量的肱动脉压进行了静水压效应校正。未校正的上臂血压显示,收缩压平均比相应的仰卧位血压下降13至14毫米汞柱,舒张压下降14至17毫米汞柱。校正后的上臂血压与各自的仰卧位血压相差在3毫米汞柱以内。静水压效应最有可能是上臂血压下降的原因。下臂血压结果不一致。包括静水压效应以及人体重量对手臂的压迫导致肱动脉受压引起的血流变化等影响可能是造成这种不一致的原因。可能的话,应在仰卧位或坐位测量肱动脉压。当患者处于侧卧位测量血压时,应使用上臂。上臂血压预计会低于各自的仰卧位血压,而下臂血压则不一致。