Murstein B I, Mathes S
Connecticut College, New London 06320-4196, USA.
J Pers Assess. 1996 Apr;66(2):337-49. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6602_11.
A replication of the "levels effect" and reported correlation of "projection" and "pathology" was undertaken using a selected set of Thematic Apperception Test (Murray, 1943) cards varied for ambiguity and scored for pathology and projection. The levels effect was not found for pathology in either a normal or psychiatric group, but was found for projection in the normal group. The correlation between projection and pathology was again clearly confirmed. It was concluded that failure to take into consideration the stimulus properties of the cards and the context in which the test was administered may lead to false attribution of pathology to normal test-takers.
使用一组经过挑选的主题统觉测验（默里，1943年）卡片进行了“水平效应”的复制以及“投射”与“病理学”之间的相关性报告，这些卡片在模糊性上有所不同，并根据病理学和投射进行评分。在正常组或精神疾病组中，均未发现病理学方面的水平效应，但在正常组中发现了投射方面的水平效应。投射与病理学之间的相关性再次得到明确证实。得出的结论是，未考虑卡片的刺激特性以及测试实施的背景可能会导致将病理学错误归因于正常的测试者。
