Suppr超能文献

投射技术中的投射 = 病理学:未被解决的问题。

Projection on projective techniques = pathology: the problem that is not being addressed.

作者信息

Murstein B I, Mathes S

机构信息

Connecticut College, New London 06320-4196, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1996 Apr;66(2):337-49. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6602_11.

Abstract

A replication of the "levels effect" and reported correlation of "projection" and "pathology" was undertaken using a selected set of Thematic Apperception Test (Murray, 1943) cards varied for ambiguity and scored for pathology and projection. The levels effect was not found for pathology in either a normal or psychiatric group, but was found for projection in the normal group. The correlation between projection and pathology was again clearly confirmed. It was concluded that failure to take into consideration the stimulus properties of the cards and the context in which the test was administered may lead to false attribution of pathology to normal test-takers.

摘要

使用一组经过挑选的主题统觉测验(默里,1943年)卡片进行了“水平效应”的复制以及“投射”与“病理学”之间的相关性报告,这些卡片在模糊性上有所不同,并根据病理学和投射进行评分。在正常组或精神疾病组中,均未发现病理学方面的水平效应,但在正常组中发现了投射方面的水平效应。投射与病理学之间的相关性再次得到明确证实。得出的结论是,未考虑卡片的刺激特性以及测试实施的背景可能会导致将病理学错误归因于正常的测试者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验