• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙科健康教育有效吗?对当前证据的系统评价。

Is dental health education effective? A systematic review of current evidence.

作者信息

Kay E J, Locker D

机构信息

Department of Oral Health and Development, Tumer Dental School University of Manchester, England.

出版信息

Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1996 Aug;24(4):231-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1996.tb00850.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0528.1996.tb00850.x
PMID:8871028
Abstract

In order that health service resources are allocated in the way which most benefits the population, systematic review of the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of programmes and interventions are required. This study examined papers relating to dental health education interventions, which were published between 1982 and 1994 (n = 143). Each was scored by two independent researchers according to twenty predetermined validity criteria. For each paper which achieved a validity score of more than 12 (n = 37), data concerning the objectives of the intervention, the types and numbers of participants, and the outcomes, were extracted from the article. Where sufficient data were provided in a paper which met more than 15 of the validity criteria quantitative meta-analysis was carried out i.e. the results of the studies were pooled in order to calculate an overall intervention effect with confidence intervals. This combination of qualitative and quantitative review techniques showed that dental health interventions have: a small positive, but temporary effect on plaque accumulation (reduction in plaque index = 0.37 95% CI -0.29-0.59); no discernible effect on caries increment and a consistent positive effect on knowledge levels. The results of this analysis suggest that further efforts to synthesise current information about dental health education, in a systematic way, are required, along with maintenance of rigorous scientific standards in evaluation research.

摘要

为了使卫生服务资源以最有利于民众的方式进行分配,需要对有关项目和干预措施有效性的现有证据进行系统评价。本研究调查了1982年至1994年间发表的与牙齿健康教育干预措施相关的论文(n = 143)。每篇论文由两名独立研究人员根据二十项预先确定的有效性标准进行评分。对于每篇有效性得分超过12分的论文(n = 37),从文章中提取有关干预目标、参与者类型和数量以及结果的数据。如果一篇符合超过15项有效性标准的论文提供了足够的数据,则进行定量荟萃分析,即汇总研究结果以计算具有置信区间的总体干预效果。这种定性和定量综述技术相结合的方法表明,牙齿健康干预措施具有:对牙菌斑积聚有小的积极但暂时的影响(牙菌斑指数降低 = 0.37,95%可信区间 -0.29 - 0.59);对龋齿增加没有明显影响,对知识水平有一致的积极影响。该分析结果表明,需要进一步努力以系统的方式综合当前有关牙齿健康教育的信息,同时在评价研究中保持严格的科学标准。

相似文献

1
Is dental health education effective? A systematic review of current evidence.牙科健康教育有效吗?对当前证据的系统评价。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1996 Aug;24(4):231-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1996.tb00850.x.
2
Effectiveness of oral health education in children - a systematic review of current evidence (2005-2011).儿童口腔健康教育的效果——对当前证据(2005 - 2011年)的系统评价
Int Dent J. 2015 Apr;65(2):57-64. doi: 10.1111/idj.12137. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
3
Primary school-based behavioural interventions for preventing caries.基于小学的预防龋齿行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;2013(5):CD009378. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009378.pub2.
4
Interdental brushing for the prevention and control of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults.成人使用牙间隙刷预防和控制牙周疾病及龋齿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 18(12):CD009857. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009857.pub2.
5
Diagnosis and management of dental caries throughout life.一生当中龋齿的诊断与管理。
NIH Consens Statement. 2001;18(1):1-23.
6
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
7
Comparative clinical study testing the effectiveness of school based oral health education using experiential learning or traditional lecturing in 10 year-old children.一项比较临床研究,测试在10岁儿童中采用体验式学习或传统讲座方式进行学校口腔健康教育的效果。
BMC Oral Health. 2015 Apr 28;15:51. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0036-4.
8
Effect of three different dental health preventive programmes on young adult individuals: a randomized, blinded, parallel group, controlled evaluation of oral hygiene behaviour on plaque and gingivitis.三种不同口腔健康预防方案对年轻成年人的影响:一项关于菌斑和牙龈炎的口腔卫生行为的随机、盲法、平行组对照评估。
J Clin Periodontol. 2007 May;34(5):407-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.001069.x.
9
Flossing for the management of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults.使用牙线清洁对成人牙周疾病和龋齿的管理作用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD008829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008829.pub2.
10
Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data.医疗服务量与健康结果:来自系统评价及意大利医院数据评估的证据
Epidemiol Prev. 2017 Sep-Dec;41(5-6 (Suppl 2)):1-128. doi: 10.19191/EP17.5-6S2.P001.100.

引用本文的文献

1
The Missing Piece in Chronic Disease Prevention: Dental Caries.慢性病预防中缺失的一环:龋齿。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2025 Aug 7;22:E48. doi: 10.5888/pcd22.250130.
2
Health promotion theory-based educational interventions for improving oral health in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于健康促进理论的儿童和青少年口腔健康改善教育干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 13;25(1):1153. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06549-3.
3
Why do my patients still have early childhood caries? a critical appraisal.
为什么我的患者仍患有幼儿龋齿?一项批判性评估。
Braz Oral Res. 2025 Jul 7;39:e065. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.065. eCollection 2025.
4
Effectiveness of edutainment use in video-based learning on oral health education for school-age children: a randomized clinical trial.基于视频的寓教于乐式学习在学龄儿童口腔健康教育中的有效性:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Mar 13;25(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05717-9.
5
Developing a Prototype Home-Based Toothbrushing Support Tool for Families in Scotland: A Mixed-Methods Study With Modified Delphi Survey and Semi-Structured Interviews.为苏格兰家庭开发一种基于家庭的牙刷支持工具原型:一项采用改良德尔菲调查和半结构化访谈的混合方法研究。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2025 Jun;53(3):296-306. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.13031. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
6
Does the transition from face-to-face to face-to-screen improve oral health literacy? A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.从面对面到面对屏幕的转变是否能提高口腔健康素养?一项非劣效性随机对照试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Feb 3;25(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05560-y.
7
Effectiveness of school-based oral health education interventions on oral health status and oral hygiene behaviors among schoolchildren: an umbrella review.基于学校的口腔健康教育干预措施对学童口腔健康状况和口腔卫生行为的有效性:一项系统综述。
Evid Based Dent. 2025 Jan 20. doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-01101-8.
8
Effectiveness of e-learning to promote oral health education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.电子学习在促进口腔健康教育中的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 22;102(51):e36550. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036550.
9
Oral Health Promotion among Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review.智障人士的口腔健康促进:一项系统综述
Eur J Dent. 2024 Feb;18(1):55-64. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1768151. Epub 2023 May 19.
10
Educational Intervention of Improve Student's Oral Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis School-Based.改善学生口腔健康的教育干预:一项基于学校的系统评价和Meta分析
Iran J Public Health. 2023 Mar;52(3):500-514. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i3.12133.